Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 2314
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents 
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 1799-1800  

Patient and hospital building-related factors should also be considered for mitigation purposes

Department of Medicine, KG's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission22-Oct-2020
Date of Acceptance24-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication29-Apr-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Harish Gupta
Associate Professor, Medicine, KG's Medical University, Lucknow - 226 003, Uttar Pradesh
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2185_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Gupta H, Gautam M, Kumar A, Verma SK. Patient and hospital building-related factors should also be considered for mitigation purposes. J Family Med Prim Care 2021;10:1799-800

How to cite this URL:
Gupta H, Gautam M, Kumar A, Verma SK. Patient and hospital building-related factors should also be considered for mitigation purposes. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 May 18];10:1799-800. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2021/10/4/1799/314923

Dear Editor,

Kumar et al. analyze risk factors and outcome among Covid-19 exposed and quarantined healthcare workers. They present their study on the status of existing practices of standard precautions.[1] Hospital transmissions of the virus is happening since the beginning of the pandemic and similar reports from other geographies are being made too.[2] In Table 1 of their study, the authors tabulate demographic and other characteristics with details of exposure of the subjects. However, in this table all the data present factors on the side of healthcare workers. What we observe is that data on the side of patients, their attendants and environment (indoor of hospital) is missing and we want to underscore this point.

As most of the exposure of the workers occurred while working in a non–Covid area, it's reasonable to surmise that their guards were down on behalf of both patients' as well as workers' side. In spread of communicable disease, it's necessary for both -patients with attendants as well as healthcare workers- to wear mask to make relative risk reduction of transmission in indoor settings.[3] When relative risk of transmission is high, a significant ratio of patients of the virus are presenting in presymptomatic and asymptomatic stages, and spread during these stages is a real risk, Rapid Antigen Test is being recognized to provide an uncomfortably high ratio of false negative result; we can reduce overall risk of transmission by making all of them wear mask.

Also in table 1, the authors count the number of workers involved in aerosol generating procedures. However, now we are realizing that it is not during the procedure alone that aerosol is generated but otherwise too. Therefore, along with mask wearing , social distancing, usage of protection devices e.g. wearing goggles and face shields and hand sanitization; other mitigation measures related to building design are needed to reduce concentration of the virus indoors. To begin with, these measures are as simple as enhancing ventilation of the enclosed spaces.[4] When we open windows of the wards, ensuing ventilation reduces concentration of all the particles in the ambient air, incluing virus. Morawska et al. write that using portable air- cleaning devices when practical, also increases protection from transmission in small rooms.

When air conditioners recirculate air in indoor environment, biological agents in it also get recirculated- potentially exposing all the persons inside to risk of infection.[5] Therefore, as far as possible, air should not be recirculated and the system should operate on 100% outdoor air. If a system otherwise utilizes dual modes of both recirculation and outdoor air, recirculation mode should be turned off to avoid potential transfer of virus through air flows between people. Ultraviolet lamps and ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, when installed in upper part of the ward, may be effective. Upper rooms germicidal ultraviolet technology is to be considered when risk of transmission is high in indoor spaces. In-duct application of germicidal ultraviolet is useful within air conditioning systems and ventilation ducts for disinfecting contaminated extracts when air is recirculating through the system.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Kumar SS, Kumar A, Kirtana J, Singh AK, Shankar SH, Khan MA, et al. Risk factors and outcome among COVID-19 exposed and quarantined healthcare workers: A study on the status of existing practices of standard precautions. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:5355-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  
Lacobucci G. Covid-19: Doctors sound alarm over hospital transmissions. BMJ 2020;369:m2013.  Back to cited text no. 2
Schunemann HJ, Akl EA, Chou R, Chu DK, Tamara ML, Mustafa RA, et al. Use of facemasks during Covid-19 pandemic. Lancet 2020;8:954-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
Connoly K. Germans embrace fresh air to ward off Coronavirus. Guardian. Sep 30, 2020. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/30/germans-embrace-fresh-air-to-ward-off-coronavirus.  Back to cited text no. 4
Morawska L, Tang JW, Bahnfleth W, Bluyssen PM, Boerstra A, Buonanno G. How can airborne transmission of COVID-19 indoors be minimised? Environ Int 2020;142:105832.  Back to cited text no. 5


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded19    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal