Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 2894
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 432-438  

A cross-sectional study of quality of life, psychiatric illness, perceived social support, suicidal risk and self- esteem among patients with burns


1 Department of Psychiatry, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Undergraduate Intern, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission06-Aug-2020
Date of Decision05-Oct-2020
Date of Acceptance05-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication30-Jan-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Amey Y Angane
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, KEM Hospital and Seth GSMC, Mumbai, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1604_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Introduction: Burns is one of the foremost causes of worldwide morbidity. Changes in appearance and functional impairment causes stigmatisation, impacting socio-occupational engagement and causing discomfort. Aims and Objectives: The study examined prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in post-burn patients, their perceived social support and self-esteem. It further assessed quality of life amongst post-burn patients. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in a tertiary care centre where 100 patients were interviewed using purposive sampling technique over six months. Patients were administered a semi-structured questionnaire along with Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and WHO Quality Of Life – BREF (WHOQOL- BREF) scales. Contingency tables and Spearman's correlation helped to examine associations and correlations. Fischer's exact test, Mann Whitney test and ANOVA test were also used for statistical analysis. Results and Discussion: There is high prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among patients with burns. The most common disorder was major depressive episode. Low self-esteem was found in one-third of patients with burns. Patients having low self-esteem had eleven times higher prevalence of suicidality. Patients with burns had high perceived social support. Quality of life in patients with burns depends on self-esteem, perceived social support and presence of psychiatric illnesses. Conclusion: This study illustrates the need for thorough evaluation and screening in patients with burns for psychopathology and self-esteem issues by primary physicians. Behaviour therapy, supportive psychotherapy, counselling and adequate socio-occupational rehabilitation of the patient should be done. Spreading awareness and organising support groups for patients with burns at the primary health centre level can be effective.

Keywords: Burns, perceived social support major depressive disorder, quality of life, self-esteem


How to cite this article:
Kadam KS, Bagal RP, Angane AY, Ghorpade GS, Anvekar AR, Unnithan VB. A cross-sectional study of quality of life, psychiatric illness, perceived social support, suicidal risk and self- esteem among patients with burns. J Family Med Prim Care 2021;10:432-8

How to cite this URL:
Kadam KS, Bagal RP, Angane AY, Ghorpade GS, Anvekar AR, Unnithan VB. A cross-sectional study of quality of life, psychiatric illness, perceived social support, suicidal risk and self- esteem among patients with burns. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 24];10:432-8. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2021/10/1/432/307934




  Introduction Top


Across the globe, burns pose a public health challenge with approximately 180,000 deaths annually. Burns also figure among the foremost causes of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYS) lost.[1] Majority of these cases occur in low or middle-income countries and almost two-third occur in the World Health Organisation (WHO) African and South-East Asia Region. In India, annually, over 1,000,000 people are moderately or severely burnt.[1] With an immensely high disease load and majority of the Indian population residing in villages, burns are among the commonest conditions which a primary care physician encounters.[2]

A major burn leads to loss of skin integrity, sensation and hypertrophic scarring. Deeper burns lead to damage or loss of important body parts.[3] Disfigurement contributes to enhanced self-consciousness, shyness and social anxiety.[4] Altered appearance and stigmatization also greatly threaten a patient's social life. Considering the impact of the burn accident, the long painful road to recovery and reintegration into society, burns can be considered as a continuous traumatic stress disorder.[5]

Many psychiatric disorders are seen in burn survivors including anxiety, psychosis and social phobia. Depression as well as Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are commonly found among patients with burns.[6]

Quality of life is composed of many facets including disease symptoms, functional capacity, impact on role performance, perceived well-being and satisfaction.[7] The long road to recovery for these patients involves dealing with pity, stares, unsolicited questions about appearance, name-calling, strained relationships, sexual dysfunction and returning to work.[8],[9]

Social reactions can be marked with the anticipation of rejection and considered stigmatising causing further discomfort. The consequences of a major burn injury are exacerbated by lack of social support.[10] Adjustment difficulties lasting for more than a period of one year after the patient has been discharged have been found to encompass the awareness of a poor quality of life and decreased self-esteem.[11],[12],[13]

The study assumes greater relevance due to the profound effect of burn injuries on different aspects of life and the lack of adequate scientific literature. The psychological aspects of burns plays an important role in compliance with long-term treatment and recovery process.[14] The study assessed prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in post-burn patients, their self-esteem and perceived social support. The study further examined the quality of life in post-burn patients.


  Methodology Top


Ethical clearance was sought from the Institutional Ethics Committee before beginning the study. Approval for the study (EC/130/2013) was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee-II of Seth G. S. Medical College. Taking into consideration previous study[15] which had shown prevalence of 46% and Cochran's formula (n = Z2PQ/e2) [where n = sample size, P = prevalence of the disease, Q = 1-P, Z = Z value at confidence levels and e = margin of error], sample size was calculated to 10% margin of error and 95% confidence levels. Hence, the sample size was taken as 100. The cross-sectional study was conducted over six months by Department of Psychiatry in the burns outpatient department (OPD) run by Department of Plastic Surgery of a tertiary care hospital.

Patients with burns of more than one month duration were recruited into the study. Patients with history of psychiatric diagnosis prior to their burns were excluded to minimise the confounding factor. Those less than 18 years of age and refusing to give consent were also excluded from the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants for consent to participate in the study and for publication of results obtained after completion of the study in the language of their choice (Marathi, Hindi or English).

By using purposive sampling technique, 100 eligible patients with burns were recruited into the study. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to document socio-demographic data of the participants and details of burn (calculated using standard 'Rule of 9' formula), present status of their treatment including physical disability and any reconstructive surgery were also noted. They were subsequently administered:

Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

The M.I.N.I. was a brief structured interview which was created for diagnosing the major Axis I psychiatric disorders. Studies indicate the M.I.N.I. to have high reliability and validity properties. It can also be administered in a shorter duration. Patients were screened for psychiatric symptoms by MINI.[16]

Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)

One of the most popular self-report method which is used for assessing global self-esteem is the RSES. Cronbach's alpha value for the RSES was 0.91.[17] Scores below 50% suggest low self-esteem while scores above that were indicative of high self-esteem.[18]

Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)

The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support was developed as a uni-dimensional tool that measures individual perception of one's social support system. A 7-point Likert-scale is used to rate the 12-items. The scale has 3 groups based upon the source of support i.e., friends, family and significant others. Scores below 50% indicate low perceived support.[19] The Cronbach's alpha of MSPSS has been found to be 0.92.[20]

WHO Quality Of Life – BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)

The development of the WHOQOL-BREF field trial version provided a short quality of life assessment. The items are rated by making use of a 5-point Likert-scale. It contains 26 questions dealing with 4 domains of physical health, psychological as well as social relationships and also, environment in addition to overall quality of life and general health. Cronbach's alpha values for the domains were 0.80 for environmental domain, 0.69 for social domain, 0.77 for psychological domain and 0.84 for physical domain, demonstrating good internal consistency.[21]

Statistical analysis

SPSS 20 software (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA) was utilised for carrying out the statistical analysis. Fischer's Exact test helped to identify statistically significant associations. Statistically significant differences were analysed using Mann Whitney U test. Correlation was calculated by using Spearman's coefficient of correlation. ANOVA was used to find whether the difference between means of multiple groups is significant or not. Prevalence risk ratio was calculated to find how self-esteem affected the risk of having psychiatric comorbidity.


  Results Top


During the period of the study, 100 patients meeting our inclusion criteria were examined in the burns OPD. They were enrolled into the study after taking their written informed consent. The response rate was 100%.

The sample was made up of 47% males and 53% females. The average age of males and females enrolled in the study was 29.53 years and 30.14 years, respectively. It was noted that 62% of the patients had flame burns, 34% had scald burns while 4% had chemical burns. These burns were attributed to bursting of stove or accidentally getting burned while doing household work. Among the 100 patients were 7% illiterates, 8% who had studied upto primary, 70% till secondary, 10% upto higher secondary (12th std.) and 5% graduates. Among the patients, 75% were married, 22% were unmarried while the remaining 3% were divorced. While 24% patients were employed, 4% were studying and 72% were currently unemployed.

It was found that 42% patients had upto 20% burns, a further 43% had between 20 and 30% burns while the rest 15% had more than 30% burns. Among patients, 61% burns had a duration of less than a year, 15% burns were between 12 and 24 months old and 16% were 2-5 years old. 2% patients had suffered burns in past 5-10 years while 6% burns were more than a decade old.

Among patients, 33% cases had a low score (<15) on RSES and 82% cases had high perceived social support while only 18% had low perceived social support. It was observed that 86% patients had high perceived social support from family, 57% from friends and 76% from other significant close relationships. [Table 1] The correlation between self-esteem and percentage of burns (p value = 0.65) as well as between perceived social support and percentage of burns (p value = 0.69) was not statistically significant.
Table 1: Sociodemographic and Clinical Data of Sample

Click here to view


It was found that 54% cases had a psychiatric diagnosis as per MINI which included 45% patients having major depressive disorder, 33% having social anxiety disorder, 26% experiencing suicidality and 16% afflicted with post-traumatic stress disorder. Regarding other psychiatric morbidities, 5% experienced panic disorder, 2% experienced generalised anxiety disorder while 6% admitted to non-alcohol substance dependence. There was no psychiatric morbidity in 46% patients.

The association between self-esteem and psychiatric morbidity (p value < 0.00001) was statistically significant. Statistically significant associations were also obtained between self-esteem and major depressive disorder (p value < 0.00001) and between self-esteem and suicidality (p value < 0.00001). The prevalence risk ratio of patients having low self-esteem suffering from psychiatric morbidity was 2.36, major depressive disorder was 3.04 and suicidality was 11.17. [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
Table 2: Prevalence risk ratio of psychiatric morbidity with self-esteem

Click here to view
Table 3: Prevalence risk ratio of major depressive diorder with self-esteem

Click here to view
Table 4: Prevalence risk ratio of suicidality with self-esteem

Click here to view


The mean score on QOL scale was 92.34. There was a statistically significant correlation [Figure 1] between perceived social support and quality of life. (p value < 0.0001, r value = 0.56) There was a significant difference obtained between self-esteem and quality of life on the Mann Whitney test. (p value < 0.0001) The ANOVA test revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between level of education, burn percentage and duration of burns with quality of life. [Table 5] There was a statistically significant difference between psychiatric morbidity on MINI and quality of life (p value = 0.037).
Figure 1: Graph showing Spearman's correlation between perceived social support and quality of life

Click here to view
Table 5: Comparison of WHO Quality of Life-BREF scores with variables of Patients with burns by One-Way ANOVA test

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The study sample included an almost equal proportion of females and males, with almost equal mean age between them. Almost three quarters of the patients with burns were unemployed. The high unemployment rate is in accordance with findings from studies which highlight that returning to pre-injury life routine is difficult for survivors, especially for those who develop symptoms of depression[22] or post-traumatic stress disorders[23] following burn injuries.

Low self-esteem was observed in one-third cases. They reported an inability to do things as well as other people. The prevalence was higher in comparison to findings reported in a study conducted by Boeden et al. where 15% patients had low self-esteem.[23] Decreased self-esteem is common in patients who were unemployed and thus, the higher prevalence of low self-esteem in the current study is explained due to 72% patients being unemployed.[24] The correlation of percentage of burns with self-esteem was not statistically significant. This was echoed in the result of a previous study.[23] Patients successfully surviving high percentage of burns have considerable emotional fortitude and thus, their self-esteem was on par with those having much lesser burns.

The mean score on perceived support scale was 5.1 which indicated high perceived support. This is in contrast to findings from an Australian study which stated that patients with burns lacked support.[9] A high perceived social support is seen in Indian context as a large number of Indian families are functionally joint with a separate residence.[25] In Indian society, interdependence and cooperation are promoted. Thus, members are capable of greater therapeutic participation, reflecting in higher perceived support by the patients.[26] Literature states that perceived social support plays a significant role in dealing with stress and post burn adjustment. Stress reduces levels of interleukin-1 alpha besides also lowering interleukin-8 levels.[27],[28],[29] This delays wound healing in burns and thus, psychoeducation of the family members to improve social support would aid in quicker recovery of the patients.

More than half the cases had a psychiatric diagnosis as per MINI. The most prevalent disorders were major depressive disorder (45%) and social anxiety disorder (33%) followed by post-traumatic stress disorder (16%). Studies conducted by Patterson et al.[30] and Malt[31] noted anxiety and depression as the commonest disorders in patients with burns. A study by Baur et al. had concluded higher prevalence of PTSD in adult population comprising of post burn patients.[32] A lower prevalence of PTSD in the current context can be attributed to the fact that higher prevalence of PTSD is more commonly seen in calamities with widespread destruction and loss of life.[33],[34],[35] In the current study, 26% patients experienced suicidality and 9% had suicidal ideations. This is lower in comparison to a western study where 33% patients had suicidal ideations.[36] These suicidal ideations could be a manifestation of the underlying depressive anxiety states.[37] The prevalence obtained stresses that importance must be given to eliciting history of suicidal ideations in post-burn patients. Immediate referrals are necessary if patients demonstrate any symptoms of psychiatric disorders to ensure a favourable prognosis.

Patients having low self-esteem had a two times higher prevalence of psychiatric morbidity, three times higher prevalence of depressive disorder and eleven times higher prevalence of experiencing suicidality. Prevalence assessment has not been done in previous studies as was brought to light in this study.

The mean overall score on quality of life was 92.34. The result was comparable to a study conducted in Seattle which stated that patients with burns had an overall good quality of life.[30] However, on comparing different domains, the psychological domain was most affected. This highlights the necessity for counselling to improve the lives of patients with burns.

The quality of life was independent of the level of education. The difference between non-modifiable factors like burn percentage and duration of burns with the quality of life was statistically insignificant. There was a statistically significant difference between psychiatric morbidity on MINI and quality of life. Patients developing any psychological morbidity experience significantly poorer life quality. This reiterated the discovery of Schneider et al.[38] who unearthed that quality of life is not affected greatly by the extent of physical injury but more by emotional factors. Patients having higher self-esteem and perceived social support reported a higher quality of life. This was in keeping with findings from previous studies which reported these subsets of patients to have greater life satisfaction.[23],[39],[40] This highlights that though patients with burns may have a long road to complete recovery, high social support makes the patients feel accepted and safe. They have a satisfied outlook towards all facets of their experiences, overcoming many negative emotions.

Thus, the quality of lives which patients with burns lead is determined by modifiable factors of perceived social support and self-esteem. Thus, self-esteem, perceived social support and psychological morbidity also need to be assessed in developing interventions geared towards improving lives of patients with burns. Effective psychiatric counselling and therapy of the burns patient along with his caregivers can thus ensure a better quality of life independent of the extent of burns.

The strengths of our study included the quantification of prevalence risks of various psychiatric illnesses among patients of burns with low self-esteem and the novel insight into modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors that affect the quality of life of these patients. Our study had some limitations. This study was done in a solitary tertiary care centre of a metropolitan city using purposive sampling. Studies including more aspects of burns like functional impairment, impact on range of motion and muscle force, quality of sleep to name a few along with behavior assessment and prognosis assessed through multiple follow-ups are future recommendations.

Primary care physicians, especially in rural areas, being the first source of medical assistance for the patient, must also give due importance to the psychological and emotional well-being of patients with burns. Consultant liaison with psychiatrists will be of paramount importance in improving the patients' quality of life in these cases. An important component of tertiary prevention is health education, which should serve as the bedrock of primary healthcare delivery in chronic diseases requiring prolonged regular follow-ups like burns. Screening services for psychological morbidities in this vulnerable population need to be carried out by community healthcare and Anganwadi workers. Improving awareness among the primary care physicians as well as the patients and their caregivers regarding this ignored aspect of burns care will help in ushering in a paradigm shift in the quality of life of these patients by allowing for the rapid, early institution of an appropriate counselling and psychoeducation regime, at the stage when it can prove to be most beneficial.


  Summary and Implications Top


Conclusions

In summary, burns is among the commonest causes of non-fatal morbidity. Low self-esteem was observed in one-third of patients with burns. The self-esteem of patients was independent of their percentage of burns suffered. Patients with burn wounds had high perceived social support irrespective of percentage of body area involved. Patients with burns have a high prevalence of psychiatric morbidity with the most common disorder being major depressive episode. Patients with burns having low self-esteem had a two times higher prevalence of psychiatric morbidity, three times higher prevalence of major depressive episode and eleven times higher prevalence of suicidality. On comparing different domains of quality of life the psychological domain was most affected followed by physical domain. Quality of life of patients with burns does not vary with percentage of burn and duration after burn. Patients with burns having low self-esteem experience a poorer quality of life. Patients developing any psychiatric morbidity experience a significantly poorer quality of life. It was found that higher the perceived social support in patients with burns, higher was their quality of life.

Clinical implications

This study was one of its kind as it clearly demonstrated that the quality of life of patients with burns depends on modifiable factors like self-esteem, perceived social support and psychological morbidity. Thus, the study highlights the importance of thorough evaluation of patients with burns for early identification and treatment of any psychopathology. Behaviour therapy, supportive psychotherapy and counselling can also help patients to deal with issues related to self-esteem, disability and psychological problems. Family members and the primary support group should be psycho-educated about the psychophysical consequences of burns and the need for better compliance. Immediate and adequate socio-occupational rehabilitation of the patient should be done. Support groups and camps for patients with burns must be organised. These caregiver and patient support groups need to be formed at the primary health centre level to improve healthcare delivery and tertiary prevention of psychological morbidities associated with burns which significantly impact the life of the patient post the incident. Spreading awareness about burns among general population will reduce the stigma associated with burns.

Key Messages

There is prevalence of psychiatric morbidities like major depressive disorder in patients with burns. Their quality of life depends on self-esteem, perceived social support and presence of psychiatric illnesses warranting thorough evaluation and screening for the same. Behaviour therapy, supportive psychotherapy, counselling and organising support groups can be effective.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Burns AH. [Internet]. Who.int. 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Jagnoor J, Bekker S, Chamania S, Potokar T, Ivers R. Identifying priority policy issues and health system research questions associated with recovery outcomes for burns survivors in India: A qualitative inquiry. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020045.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Lang TC, Zhao R, Kim A, Wijewardena A, Vandervord J, Xue M, et al. A critical update of the assessment and acute management of patients with severe burns. Adv Wound Care 2019;8:607-33.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Dyster-Aas J, Williebrand M, Wikehult B, Gerdin B, Ekselius S. Major depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms following severe burn injury in relation to lifetime psychiatry morbidity. J Trauma 2008;64:1349-56.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Williams FN, Chrisco L, Strassle PD, Laughon SL, Sljivic S, Nurczyk K, et al. Bias in alcohol and drug screening in adult burn patients. Int J Burns Trauma 2020;10:146-55.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Du Y, Lv GZ, Yu S, Wang D, Tan Q. Long-term medical treatment of patients with severe burns at exposed sites. World J Clin Cases 2020;8:3515-26.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Pinna T, Edwards DJ. A systematic review of associations between interoception, vagal tone, and emotional regulation: Potential applications for mental health, wellbeing, psychological flexibility, and chronic conditions. Front Psychol 2020;11:1792.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Barrett LW, Fear VS, Waithman JC, Wood FM, Fear MW. Understanding acute burn injury as a chronic disease. Burns Trauma 2019;7:23.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Armstrong-James L, Cadogan J, Williamson H, Rumsey N, Harcourt D. An evaluation of the impact of a burn camp on children and young people's concerns about social situations, satisfaction with appearance and behaviour. Scars Burn Heal 2018;4:2059513118816219. doi: 10.1177/2059513118816219.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Atiyeh BS, Gunn SW. Refugee camps, fire disasters and burn injuries. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2017;30:214-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Pompermaier L, Elmasry M, Steinvall I. Self-inflicted burns in a National Swedish Burn Centre: An overview. Ann Burns fire Disasters 2019;32:272-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gibson JA, Yarrow J, Brown L, Evans J, Rogers SN, Spencer S, et al. Identifying patient concerns during consultations in tertiary burns services: Development of the Adult Burns Patient Concerns Inventory. BMJ Open 2019;9:e032785.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Crumley I, Blom L, Laflamme L, Alvesson HM. What do emergency medicine and burns specialists from resource constrained settings expect from mHealth-based diagnostic support? A qualitative study examining the case of acute burn care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018;18:71.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Druery M, Newcombe PA, Cameron CM, Lipman J. Factors influencing psychological, social and health outcomes after major burn injuries in adults: Cohort study protocol. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017545.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Madianos MG, Papaghelis M, Ioannovich J, Dafni R. Psychiatric disorders in burn patients: A follow-up study. Psychother Psychosom 2001;70:30-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Goyal S, Gupta B, Sharma E, Dalal PK, Pradeep Y. Psychiatric morbidity, cultural factors, and health-seeking behaviour in perinatal women: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary care centre of North India. Ind J Psychol Med 2020;42:52-60.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Sinclair SJ, Blais MA, Gansler DA, Sandberg E, Bistis K, Locicero A. Psychometric properties of the rosenberg self-esteem scale: Overall and across demographic groups living within the United States. Eval Health Prof 2010;33:56-80.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gazzaniga M. Psychological Science. Sixth edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 2018. [cited 19 October 2020]. Available from: https://wwnorton.com/college/psych/psychsci/media/rosenberg.htm.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Zimet G, Dahlem N, Zimet S, Farley G. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Personal Assess 1998;52:30-41.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Akhtar A, Rahman A, Husain M, Chaudhry IB, Duddu V, Husain N. Multidimensional scale of perceived social support: Psychometric properties in a South Asian population. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010;36:845-51.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med 1998;28:551-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Thombs BD, Bresnick MG, Magyar-Rusell G. Depression in survivors of burn injury: A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2006;28:494-502.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Boeden ML, Feller I, Tholen D, Davidson TN, James MH. Self-esteem of severely burned patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1980;61:449-52.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Rubab S, Kalsoom AC. Assessment of self-esteem and depression in burn afflicted women. J Depress Anxiety 2018;7:307.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Sonawat R. Understanding families in India: A reflection of societal changes. Psic: Teor e Pesq 2001;17:177-86.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Chadda RK, Deb KS. Indian family systems, collectivistic society and psychotherapy. Indian J Psychiatry 2013;55:S299-309.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Nawas AF, Kanchwala M, Thomas-Jardin SE, Dahl H, Daescu K, Bautista M, et al. IL-1-conferred gene expression pattern in ERα+ BCa and AR+PCa cells is intrinsic to ERα− BCa and AR − PCa cells and promotes cell survival. BMC Cancer 2020;20:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Amjadi A, Mirmiranpor H, Khandani S, Sobhani SO, Shafaee Y. Intravenous laser wavelength irradiation effect on interleukins: IL-1α, IL-1β, IL6 in diabetic rats. Laser Ther 2019;28:267-73.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Muangman P, Sullivan SR, Wiechman S, Bauer G, Honari S, Heimbach DM, et al. Social support correlates with survival in patients with massive burn injury. J Burn Care Rehabil 2005;26:352–6.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Patterson DR, Everett JJ, Bombardier CH, Questad KA, Lee VK, Marvin JA. Psychological effects of severe burn injuries. Psychol Bull 1993;113:362-78.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Malt U, Ugland OM. A long-term psychosocial follow-up study of severe burned adults: Review of literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1989;355:94-102.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Baur KM, Hardy PE, Van Dorsten B. Post-traumatic stress disorders in burn populations: A critical review of literature. J Burn Care Rehab 1998;19:270-80.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Housen T, Lenglet A, Ariti C, Shah S, Shah H, Ara S, et al. Prevalence of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in the Kashmir Valley. BMJ Glob Health 2017;2:e000419.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Marthoenis M, Nirwana A, Fathiariani L. Prevalence and determinants of posttraumatic stress in adolescents following an earthquake. Indian J Psychiatry 2019;61:526-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
35.
Asim M, Mekkodathil A, Sathian B, Elayedath R, N RK, Simkhada P, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder among the flood affected population in Indian subcontinent. Nepal J Epidemiol 2019;9:755-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Edwards RR, Magyar-Russell G, Thombs B. Acute pain at discharge from hospitalization is a prospective predictor of long-term suicidal ideation after burn injury. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2007;88:36-42.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Lönnqvist J. Major psychiatric disorders in suicide and suicide attempters. In: Wasserman D, Wasserman C, editors. Oxford Textbook of Suicidology and Suicide Prevention. Chapter 38. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. [cited 2020 Oct 19]. Available from: https://m.oxfordmedicine.com/mobile/view/10.1093/med/9780198570059.001.0001/med-9780198570059-chapter-38.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Schneider JC, Trinh NH, Selleck E, Fregni F, Salles SS, Ryan CM. The long-term impact of physical and emotional trauma: The station nightclub fire. PLoS One 2012;7:e47339.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Harrison CJ, Tyler MP, Rodrigues JN. Value-based plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.019.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Ke X, Liu C, Li N. Social support and quality of life: A cross-sectional study on survivors eight months after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. BMC Public Health 2010;10:573.  Back to cited text no. 40
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Methodology
  Results
  Discussion
   Summary and Impl...
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed190    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal