Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 1081
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 265-271  

A clinical study on surgical causes of Hematuria


1 SRD, Department of General Surgery, NEIGRIHMS, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
2 Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, NEIGRIHMS, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
3 Professor, Department of General Surgery, Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh, Assam, India

Date of Submission26-Aug-2020
Date of Decision27-Oct-2020
Date of Acceptance05-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication30-Jan-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kewithinwangbo Newme
SRD, Department of General Surgery, NEIGRIHMS
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1750_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Introduction: Hematuria is a clinical sign and symptom that every individual would have a worst nightmare and invokes a physician to carefully evaluate possible causes of hematuria. It may be medical or surgical causes. A thorough examination is required to exact the primary pathology. As such, a study on hematuria in North east India is not sufficiently researched or published. Material & methods: Here we present an observational study in our institution on that very topic. A study was done purely on surgical causes of hematuria on symptomatic patients. It was done on the inpatient and outpatient basis in Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh during the period of 2016–2019. Total 43 patients were evaluated, who came with symptomatic hematuria. Results: Out of 43 cases of symptomatic hematuria, 34 were male and 9 were females patients. Carcinoma urinary bladder was the commonest cause of hematuria, followed by BPH, urolithiasis, carcinoma prostrate, carcinoma upper urinary tract, etc. Conclusion: Benign prostatic hyperplasia was found to be the most common benign cause and carcinoma bladder was the commonest malignant cause of hematuria.

Keywords: Hematuria; causes of hematuria, medical, surgical


How to cite this article:
Newme K, Hajong R, Bhuyan RK. A clinical study on surgical causes of Hematuria. J Family Med Prim Care 2021;10:265-71

How to cite this URL:
Newme K, Hajong R, Bhuyan RK. A clinical study on surgical causes of Hematuria. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 26];10:265-71. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2021/10/1/265/307956




  Introduction Top


Hematuria can be defined as a frank blood coming with the urine or microscopically when more than three red blood cells (RBCs) are seen under per high-power magnification.[1] Hematuria may be described as macroscopic or microscopic. It is known as gross hematuria when the patient can see blood coming in the urine and when the presence of RBCs in the urine is detected under microscopic examination only, it is known as microscopic hematuria. It is noted that asymptomatic hematuria is more prevalent than symptomatic and in approximately 9–18%,[2] RBCs were noted in asymptomatic adults, and among them 13% land up in urologic malignancy.[3]

The causes of hematuria can be categorized into glomerular or non-glomerular.[1] When RBC casts, dymorphic erythrocytes are present in the urine along with proteinuria, it is known as glomerular hematuria.[1] Various causes (especially surgical causes) ranges from calculi, neoplasm, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), cystitis, trauma, urethral stricture, iatrogenic from recent instrumentation, cystocele, vesicoureteral reflux, posterior urethral valves.[4] If microscopic hematuria occurs because of benign causes like menstruation, recent vigorous exercise, viral illness or trauma, repeated analysis of the urine should be done after 48 h of cessation of these activities.[5]

The source of hematuria can be predicted from each relationship to the various stages of urination. Hematuria at the beginning of micturiction usually suggest inflammatory causes from urethra, whereas if the source of hematuria is from neck of urinary bladder or prostatic part of urethra, Hematuria will be seen toward the last part of urination.[1]

Usually any amount of blood in urine of adults should prompt investigations, keeping in mind malignancy as the first differential diagnosis.[1] A detailed history, physical examination are indispensible to the evaluation of hematuria and its relevant investigations are needed to evaluate the causes of hematuria.

Here in the study, the focus is to find out the different surgical causes of hematuria by clinical assessment/investigation and to assess the different modes of their managements.


  Materials and Methods Top


  • Inclusion criteria- 1) Patients attending inpatient or outpatient department with symptomatic hematuria.
  • Exclusion criteria-
    1. Patients with medical cause of hematuria like glomerulonephritis, IgA nephropathy, hemoglobinopathies, drugs induced hematuria, bleeding disorders, nephritic syndrome, Alport syndrome, etc.
    2. Patients aged less than 18 years.
    3. Patients with exercise induced hematuria.
    4. Postoperative cases involving the KUB region
    5. Patients with traumatic causes of hematuria.
    6. Patients who are not giving consent for study.


Ethical Clearance:- The study was conducted after obtaining ethical clearance institute Ethics Committee (Human) of Assam Medical College and Hospital.

In this study, Gross hematuria and microscopic hematuria (>3/high power field) were taken as a standard criteria for inclusion. Medical causes are excluded after proper clinical, laboratory, and radiological investigations.

Causes like bleeding diathesis, hemoglobinopathy, and glomerulonephritis are sorted out by performing the investigations like complete blood count, coagulation profile, hemoglobin typing and irine examination and cytology. After evaluation of hematuria patients, treatment/surgical procedures was initiated according to the etiology and they were properly followed up.


  Result and Observations Top


We have 43 cases of symptomatic hematuria, among which 34 case are male and 9 are female patients [Table 1]. We have noted that above 50 years groups' accounts for most affected groups [Table 2]. Carcinoma urinary bladder is found to be a common cause of hematuria [Table 3] followed by BPH, urolithiasis, carcinoma prostrate, carcinoma upper urinary tract, carcinoma renal and adult polycystic kidney disease, respectively. Treatment are given accordingly to the causes and stages of diseases.
Table 1: Sex distribution of haematuria

Click here to view
Table 2: Age-wise distribution of Haematuria

Click here to view
Table 3: Distribution of the patients in relation to etiology

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In the present study, it was noted that symptomatic hematuria are more common in male gender [Table 1] and it involved the above 50 years groups [Table 2]. Carcinoma bladder was found to be common cause of hematuria [Table 3].

The mean age in their series of Keng Lim Ng et al.[6] was 59 years. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (22.1%) was the most common cause in their series of 390 patients. The other causes included urinary tract calculi (20%), cystitis, tumors of urinary bladder, and other genito-urinary tract.

M A Ogunjimi et al.[7] during their 1 year study found that benign prostatic hyperplasia (30.4%) was the most frequent cause of hematuria and carcinoma of urinary bladder (12.6%) along with prostatic cancer (10.1%) were the other causes.

D. Dawan et al.[8] also had a similar finding to the present study in terms of common cause of hematuria, that is, cancer of urinary bladder (31%), BPH (14%), and urolithiasis (12%). The present study showed that carcinoma bladder (51.16%) is the most common cause followed by BPH (20.93%) and urolithiasis (11.62%).

According to Debkumar Ray et al.,[9] mean age of carcinoma bladder was 57 years old and more predilection for male individual. In the present study, we have found that carcinoma bladder is common in above 50 years of age and has a more predilection toward male gender.

Konstantinos Stamatiou et al.[10] studied that ultrasonography has the sensitivity (87.1%) and specificity (98.1%) and concluded that cystoscopy is better than ultrasonography (USG) in assessing a bladder pathology.

In the present study, we found that USG abdomen was able to detect a bladder growth in all cases of suspected carcinoma bladder and cystoscopy further consolidate the findings [Figure 1]. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) sensitivity was 63.63%.
Figure 1: (arrow) showing cystocopy view of urinary bladder growth

Click here to view


CA Sadow et al. study showed that CT scans sensitivity and specificity were 79% and 94%, respectively. For cystoscopy, accuracy rate was 93%.[11]

Arsalan Aliramaji (2015)[12] found that the most common tumors type involvement is transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), and other tumors included are adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma. Present study also have a transitional tumor type.

Maurizio Brausi et al.[13] recommended that in case of non-muscle invasive urinary bladder carcinoma, a complete transurethral bladder tumor resection, that is, TURBT is sufficed. In case of low risk and intermediate cases, a chemotherapeutic instillation, that is, intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin or intravesical chemotherapy immediately after post TURBT is suggested. In cases of high risk, recommendation is instillation of bacillus Calmette-Guérin as induction dose plus maintenance dose.

Chen RC, et al.[14] stated that with trimodality therapy, (TURBT, Chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) 5 years survival rates ranges from 48 to 65% in case of muscle invasive disease.

In our study, we had 16 cases of low-grade transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) and 5 cases were high-grade transitional cell carcinoma. Depending on the stage of tumor, patients were subjected to the treatment shown in [Table 4].
Table 4: A type of therapy given to carcinoma urinary bladder

Click here to view


In this study, 9 patients have presented with a complain of hematuria because of BPH and maximum were above the 50 years age group. Wenying Wang et al.[15] study showed that common age groups presenting with a BPH were 40 years and above groups was 36.6%.

In this study, we have found that other than hematuria, hesitancy occur in 67%, urgency in 67%, increased frequency in 44.44%, and weak stream in 88.9%. Some of them had a history of catheterization in the past. Some of them presented with retention of urine.

J.L. Bosch et al.[16] reported a series of BPH and noted the frequency of symptom (in decreasing order), that is, Nocturia -75%, Increased frequency of urine- 60%, weak urinary stream -47% Urgency for urination-31%, Incomplete emptying of bladder 30%, Hesitancy of micturiction-15%.

Jens Rassweiler et al.[17] found that the complications following TURP to be TUR syndrome 1.1%, clot retention 5%, and urinary tract infection 8.2%, urinary retention 9%. And also found that in 30–40% patients, urge incontinence of urine happen early, but stress incontinence because of iatrogenic cause is rare (<0.5%).

Preliminary decompression was done in all cases. 8 cases were subjected to TURP [Figure 2]. In 1 case, symptom got relief following conservative treatment with medication. In the study, 3 patients had a hemorrhage postoperatively, for which blood transfusion were given to the patients. Temporary incontinence occurred in 1 patients in early postoperative period. All the patients showed improvement of symptoms in subsequent follow-up.
Figure 2: Intraoperative TURP (Transurethral resection of prostrate) procedure

Click here to view


In the present study, the incidence of urolithiasis as a cause of hematuria was 11.62%, that is, 5 cases. If taking into account the age distribution, in this study above 3rd decade have contributed to 9.3% and male and female ratio is 4:1.

Haithem Abd Al-Khazrajee et al.[18] noted that age group 21-50 years are more susceptible to urolithiasis. RB Nerli et al.[19] found that male individual are prone to urolithiasis.

Richard et al.[20] studied upon 163 patients and noted that the stones were seen on 63% of the KUB (kidney, ureter, bladder) X-rays. Plain X-ray abdomen was performed in all the cases. All cases were detected calculi in X-ray abdomen film as the stone size were greater than 1 cm [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Stone in x –ray erect abdomen

Click here to view


Salinawati B, et al.[21] did a retrospective comparative study of sensitivity and specificity of USG on a 201 patients for the presence of calculi. They found that the sensitivity and specificity of renal stone detection on USG were 53% and 85%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of ureteric stone detection on USG were 12% and 97%, respectively.

Plain X-ray KUB was carried out on those 5 cases, X-ray KUB had detected the calculi. USg was done and in all cases, it was found that USG is able to detect stone in symptomatic patients and also catched an obstructive effect on kidney. Hydronephrosis changes was seen in 2 cases. Intravenous urography was done in all cases [Figure 4]. In all cases, it revealed normal functioning kidney.
Figure 4: Intravenous urogram (IVU) depicting a hydronephrosis changes due to stone

Click here to view


In this study, the stones size was more than 1 cm. Open procedure was performed. It was found that intra-operative finding was same as pre-operative diagnosis. Ahmed R. El-Nahas et al.[22] found that the stone free rate after open surgery to be 78.6%. No recurrence were noted within the stipulated period of study.

In the study, we had three cases of carcinoma prostrate. Elizabeth J. Davis et al.[23] found that carcinoma prostrate is common in 65–74 years age groups. M. A. Sutton et al.[24] emphasized that the per rectal examination is critical for the detection of early stage prostate cancers and other ano-rectal disease, and should be remain a part of the regular screening physical examination.

In our study, on digital rectal examination, the glands were indurated and there was a obliteration of lateral sulci in each of them. USG abdomen showed irregularity in gland and hypertrophied bladder wall in 2 patients. In 1 patient, CT abdomen finding showed extracapsular infiltration with retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Skiagrams of that patient show bony involvement.

Histopathological finding showed adenocarcinoma type in two patient. Another patient was diagnosed as stage IV carcinoma prostate and later on the patient expired. In two patients, transureteral resection of prostrate (TURP) with bilateral orchidectomy was done. 1 patient of stage IV was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy and but later on the patient expired.

Donald S. crain et al.[25] suggested that in cases of advanced carcinoma prostate simply doing TURP procedure can alleviate urinary symptoms.

In this study, we had 2 patients of carcinoma of upper urinary tract. Both are female and aged 57 years and 46 years respectively. Diagnosis was made based on USG, CT KUB, cystoscopy [Figure 5], intra-operative, and histopathology finding.
Figure 5: Cystoscopy picture of lower ureter growth

Click here to view


Holmang and Johansson[26] noted that the incidence of upper tract tumors is highest; in the age ranging from 75 to 79 years. Anderstrom C, et al. found that the upper urinary tract carcinoma is rare before the age of 40 years and the mean age of presentation is at the age of 65 years.[27]

According to Hagen Blaszyk et al.,[28] the male–female ratio was 2.8:1 and the median age of presentation was 70 years. Here, in the study, we had two patients of female gender.

USH showed a large left lower ureteric mass with hydronephrosis changes in one patient and another showed a left upper ureteric mass involving left Kidney. Computed tomography showed a heterogenous mass in left upper ureteric involving left pelvicalyceal system in 1st patient and a heterogenous mass at left lower ureteric region with hydronephrosis changes in a 2nd patient. Histopathology finding shows transitional cell carcinoma.

Jeffrey J Leow et al.[29] advocated that in a low and high risk diseases, kidney sparing surgery (KSS) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) should be performed respectively and also recommended platinum-based combination chemotherapy. We performed radical nephroureterectomy [Figure 6] in both the patients. Gemcitabine and cisplatin were given to both the patients.
Figure 6: Resected specimen of radical nephroureterectomy

Click here to view


In this study, only 1 case, aged 47 years/female was diagnosed as stage II renal cell carcinoma (RCC), presented with hematuria. Shalini Agnihotri et al.[30] studied on 617 patients and found that the mean age of presentation was age younger than 50 years and clear cell RCC account for 71.33% of the patients. Clear cell accounts for 75% of all RCCs, representing the most common histological subtypes of RCC (Muglia VF, et al.).[31] Ares Valdés Y, et al.[32] established that USG and CT scan could confirmed the 100% diagnosis of the renal tumors.

On clinical examination, a lump was present. USG and CT abdomen [Figure 7] confirmed the diagnosis. The patient had undergone left sided radical nephrectomy. Histopathological report showed clear cell type. The patient came for follow-up and showed good response.
Figure 7: CT abdomen scan growth in left renal growth

Click here to view


In this study, 1 case was diagnosed as bilateral polycystic kidney disease. The female patient aged 50 years presented with gross hematuria and lump abdomen. Her serum creatinine level was 6.6 mg/dl, Hb% was 5.5 gm%. USG abdomen showed multiple cysts with loss of renal parenchyma. CT KUB could not be done. Christian R Halvorson et al.[33] noted that polycystic kidney disease typically affect 30–50 years of age groups, moreover it could present with acute pain abdomen and gross or microscopic hematuria. Two cysts in each kidney in any individuals, age ranging from 30 to59 years, and 4 cysts in each kidney in above 60 years of age, adult polycystic kidney (ADPK) should be favored (Ravine D, et al.).[34] Hematuria in ADPK results from rupture of cysts and bleeding is usually self-limited. She was treated conservatively with blood transfusion and within 2 days, hematuria stops and serum creatinine levels came down after dialysis. She is being on followed up.


  Conclusion Top


This observational study has shown that hematuria is a symptom arising from urinary tract system disease, involving all the age groups. It may be caused by benign or malignant diseases of the urinary system. Benign prostatic hyperplasia was found to be the most common benign cause and carcinoma bladder was the commonest malignant cause of hematuria. Although in the present study, sample size is less, but taking into account all the others studies, it is observed that common surgical cause of hematuria is found to be a carcinoma bladder and BPH in older aged group and urolithiasis in younger aged group (except the exclusion criteria). So at last, we suggest to click in mind a aforesaid probable surgical cause of hematuria, if any patients present with blood in the urine.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Gerber GS, Brendler CB. Evaluation of the urologic patient: History, physical examination, and urinalysis. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed., vol 3. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2012. p. 73-98.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Yun EJ, Meng MV, Carroll PR. Evaluation of the patient with hematuria. Med Clin N Am 2004;88:329-43.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Johnson EK, Daignault S, Zhang Y, Lee CT. Patterns of hematuria referral to urologists: Does a gender disparity exist? J Urol 2008;72:498-503.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Patel JV, Chambers CV, Gomella LG. Hematuria: Etiology and evaluation for the primary care physician. Can J Urol 2008;15(Suppl 1):54-61.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mariani AJ. The evaluation of adult hematuria: A clinical update. AUA Update Series 1998;XVII: 186-91.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ng KL, Htun TH, Dublin N, Ong TA, Razack AH. Assessment and clinical significance of haematuria in Malaysian patients-relevance to early cancer diagnosis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:2515-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ogunjimi MA, Adetayo FO, Tijani KH, Jeje EA, Ogo CN, Osegbe DN. Gross haematuria among adult Nigerians: Current trend. Niger Postgrad Med J 2011;18:30-3.  Back to cited text no. 7
  [Full text]  
8.
Dawam D, Kalayi GD, Osuide JA, Muhammad I, Garg SK. Haematuria in Africa: Is the pattern changing? BJU Int 2001;87:326-30.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ray D. A retrospective study of bladder cancer and the impact of age, sex and smoking habits with related clinicopathological correlations in the tribal population of Bankura, WB, India. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2013;1:29-32.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Stamatiou K, Papadoliopoulos I, Dahanis S, Zafiropoulos G, Polizois K. The accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of superficial bladder tumors in patients presenting with hematuria. Ann Saudi Med 2009;29:134-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Sadow CA, Silverman SG, O'Leary MP, Signorovitch JE. Bladder cancer detection with CT urography in an Academic medical center. Radiology 2008;249:195-202.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Aliramaji A, Kaseean A, Pasha YR, Shafi H, Kamali S, Safari M, et al. Age distribution types of bladder cancers and their relationship with opium consumption and smoking. Caspian J Intern Med 2015;6:82-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Brausi M, Witjes JA, Lamm D, Persad R, Palou J, Colombel M, et al. A review of current guidelines and best practice recommendations for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer by the International bladder cancer group. J Urol 2011;186:2158-67.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Chen RC, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, Zietman AL. Trimodality bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2013;11:952-60.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Wang W, Guo Y, Zhang D, Tian Y, Zhang X. The prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in mainland China: Evidence from epidemiological surveys. Sci Rep 2015;5:13546.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bosch JL, Hop WC, Kirkels WJ, Schröder FH. The International prostate symptom score in a community- based sample of men between 55 and 74 years of age: Prevalence and correlation of symptoms with age, prostate volume, flow rate and residual urine volume. Br J Urol 1995;75:622-30.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)—Incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 2006;50:969-79; discussion 980.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Al-Khazrajee HA, Sahi IS. Urbanization as a risk factor for renal stone formation. Bas J Surg 2015;21:90-4.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Nerli RB, Patil S, Hiremath MB, Patil RA. Renal stone disease in the border regions of Karnataka, Maharashtra and Goa: Role of diet, urinary pH and body mass index. Indian J Health Sci 2014;7:83-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Johnston R, Lin A, Du J, Mark S. Comparison of kidney- ureter- bladder abdominal radiography and computed tomography scout films for identifying renal calculi. BJU Int 2009;104:670-3.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Bakin S, Hing EY, Fam XI, Annuar ZM. Accuracy of ultrasound versus computed tomography urogram in detecting urinary tract calculi. Med J Malaysia 2015;70:238-42.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, Shoma AM, Eraky I, Sarhan OM, Hafez AT, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for treatment of staghorn stones in pediatric patients. Can Urol Assoc J 2014;8:E906-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Davis EJ, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Yee CL, Cooney KA. Risk of second primary tumors in men diagnosed with prostate cancer: A population- based cohort study. Cancer 2014;120:2735-41.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sutton MA, Gibbons RP, Correa Jr RJ. Is deleting the digital rectal examination a good idea? West J Med 1991;155:43.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Crain DS, Amling CL, Kane CJ. Palliative transurethral prostate resection for bladder outlet obstruction in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. J Urol 2004;171:668-71.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Holmäng S, Johansson SL. Synchronous bilateral ureteral and renal pelvic carcinomas. Cancer 2004;101:741-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Anderström C, Johansson SL, Pettersson S, Wahlqvist L. Carcinoma of the ureter: A clinicopathologic study of 49 cases. J Urol 1989;142:280-3.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Blaszyk H, Wang L, Dietmaier W, Hofstädter F, Burgart LJ, Cheville JC, et al. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A clinicopathologic study including microsatellite instability analysis. Mod Pathol 2002;15:790-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Leow JJ, Liu Z, Tan TW, Lee YM, Yeo EK, Chong YL. Optimal management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Current perspectives. Onco Targets Ther 2020;13:1-15.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Agnihotri S, Kumar J, Jain M, Kapoor R, Mandhani A. Renal cell carcinoma in India demonstrates early age of onset and a late stage of presentation. Indian J Med Res 2014;140:624.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
31.
Muglia VF, Prando A. Renal cell carcinoma: Histological classification and correlation with imaging findings. Radiol Bras 2015;48:166-74.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Ares VY, Amador SB, Morales JC, Alonso DF, Carballo VL, Fragas VR, et al. [The role of CT scan in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma]. Arch Esp Urol 2004;57:737-42.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Halvorson CR, Bremmer MS, Jacobs SC. Polycystic kidney disease: Inheritance, pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2010;3:69-83.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Ravine D, Sheffield LJ, Danks DM, Gibson RN, Walker RG, Kincaid-Smith P. Evaluation of ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease 1. Lancet 1994;343:824-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
   Result and Obser...
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed172    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded16    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal