Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 375
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 4936-4941  

Staphylococcus aureus including MRSA nasal carriage among hospital exposed and unexposed medical students


1 Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Madhya Pradesh, India
3 Department of Microbiology, Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India
4 Department of Microbiology, National Institute of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Submission09-May-2020
Date of Decision14-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance14-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication30-Sep-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Vikrant Negi
Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Haldwani - 263 129, Uttarakhand
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_820_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common human pathogen causing a wide range of infections. It is estimated that S.aureus colonizes the anterior nares in approximately 31% of the general population at any given time. The incidence of community acquired & hospital acquired S. aureus has been increasing over the past few decades, predominantly due to continuous upsurge in the drug resistant isolates. Moreover, globally the incidence of methicillin resistant S.aureus (MRSA) is progressively increasing. Hence, it would be imperative to screen all healthcare workers, interns and admitted patients for MRSA carriage and to treat all those who are found positive for the same. With the above background, the current study was undertaken to investigate the carrier rate of S. aureus (including MRSA) among hospital unexposed & exposed medical students. Methods: A total of 181 medical students of Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Government Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand. Study participants were broadly divided into two groups: hospital exposed group (n=107) and hospital unexposed group (n=74). Nasal swabs were obtained & cultured for the detection of S. aureus. Congo red agar and 0.1% Crystal Violet Assay were performed to observe the ability to form in vitro biofilm by S. aureus. Results: Out of total 181 medical students 29.28% were found to be healthy carrier of S. aureus. Among the hospital exposed group 37.38% and among hospital unexposed group 17.57% were found to be healthy carrier of S. aureus. Only one student (hospital exposed group) was found to be positive for MRSA. Beta-lactamase production was noted in 90.57% strains of S. aureus while the significant rate of slime layer production was observed in 73.58% of strains. Conclusion: Prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage increases with the duration of exposure to the hospital environment. The nasal carriage of S. aureus in medical students indicate the potential danger of dissemination of S. aureus including MRSA from them to the hospitalized patients which in turn complicates the treatment of same.

Keywords: Biofilm, Congo red agar, mecA, Nosocomial infection, Penicilinase


How to cite this article:
Sharma S, Pal S, Negi V, Juyal D, Sharma M, Prakash R. Staphylococcus aureus including MRSA nasal carriage among hospital exposed and unexposed medical students. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:4936-41

How to cite this URL:
Sharma S, Pal S, Negi V, Juyal D, Sharma M, Prakash R. Staphylococcus aureus including MRSA nasal carriage among hospital exposed and unexposed medical students. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 20];9:4936-41. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2020/9/9/4936/296353




  Introduction Top


Staphylococcus aureus, one of the commonest pathogen, can cause various infections ranging from localized skin infections to fatal meningitis in humans.[1] Staphylococcal infections occur regularly in hospitalized patients and has serious consequences despite the antibiotic therapy. The virulence of this organism occurs through cross-infection by spread from patient to patient in hospitals and other institutional settings. In contrast, healthy individuals have a small risk of contracting as an invasive infection, but they can be carriers of S. aureus.[2] The primary habitat of S. aureus in moist squamous epithelium of the anterior nares so the most invasive infections by this organism are assumed to arise from nasal carriage.[3] Increased colonization of S. aureus in patients and healthcare workers frequently occurs in hospitals. Both hospital and community-acquired infections caused by drug resistant S. aureus has increased in the past three decades.

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are an increasing problem in the world among infected patients; antibiotic resistance is associated with increase in length of stay, healthcare costs, and patient morbidity and mortality.[4]

Swoopstake use and exposure of antimicrobials has led to antibiotic resistance of S. aureus.[5] The incidence of community-acquired and hospital-acquired S. aureus infections has been rising with increasing emergence of drug-resistant strains like methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).[5],[6],[7] The difference between MRSA and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics; this is often associated with resistance to multiple other antibiotics, which limits the therapeutic options.[8] MRSA, once used to be confined to the hospital environment, has now circulated in the community among previously healthy patients.[9] Numbers of infections due to MRSA are consistently high and remain a major risk to hospitalized patients.[10] The major treatment option for MRSA remains Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, and Linezolid, however more recently decline in the MIC of Vancomycin and Linezolid in MRSA were reported.[11] Even after treating MRSA infections with empirical anti-MRSA therapy the mortality rate remains high specially among the geriatric patients.[12]

Medical students come in contact with patients in outpatients departments (OPDs), wards, intensive care units (ICUs), and in operation theaters. There is chance of disseminating S. aureus from medical students to the patients or vice-versa. Medical students during their first-year course do not visit the OPD, Wards, ICUs, and operation theaters while second year on wards they are regularly posted in clinics where they come in contact with patients. Clinical exposure of 1–2 years were reported not affecting the carriage rate of MRSA among the medical students of a Taiwanese University,[13] though few studies has proven that exposure to the hospital environment of a prolonged duration may cause an increase of MRSA carriage among the health personnel.[14],[15],[16] Therefore, this study was conducted to figure out the prevalence of S. aureus including MRSA among medical students exposed to hospital environment against those who are not exposed and the ability of the isolates to form biofilm.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study design and population

An experimental based cross-sectional study, which included nasal swab of 181 medical students was considered. A written permission from Institutional Ethical Committee was obtained to conduct the study (IEC/VCSGGIMS&R/13/2013, Dated: 10.05.2013). The healthy medical students who had no history upper respiratory tract infection and/or had no antibiotic intake in past 1 month were included in the study.

Study setting

The study was conducted in the department of Microbiology & Immunology of Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Government Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (V.C.S.G.G.I.M.S.& R) located at Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand. Medical students studying in the same institute were included in this study.

Students were divided into two groups: hospital exposed and hospital unexposed. In hospital unexposed group, first year medical students were included, who were considered as representative of community; the hospital exposed group consisted of second year onward medical students having at least 6 months of hospital exposure in the form of clinical postings at Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna (HNB) Base Hospital. All the subjects were sampled, after obtaining a written informed consent along with duly filled questionnaire.

Sample collection

Nasal swab was collected from the anterior nares with the help of pre-sterilized cotton swab and proceeded immediately in the bacteriology laboratory in the Dept. of Microbiology and Immunology.

Laboratory proceedings

Nasal swabs collected from both groups of students were inoculated on Mannitol Salt Agar and 5% sheep blood agar incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The isolates grown on culture medium were identified by Gram staining, Catalase test, Coagulase test (slide and tube method), DNAse, and Phosphatase tests followed by antibiotic susceptibility test by Kirby & Bauer's disc diffusion test. Methicillin resistance was detected by taking cefoxitin (30 μg) as a surrogate marker and was confirmed by using PBP2a latex agglutination test (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, UK).

Beta-lactamase production

S. aureus strains were further tested for Beta-lactamase production. It was detected by following two different iodometric methods:[17]

  1. Test tube method - A loopful of heavy inoculums of 24 h old cultures from Muller Hinton agar were mixed well with 1.0 ml Penicillin solution containing 10,000 Unit per ml. The tubes were left for 60 min at room temperature, mixing in between every 15 min. Then two drops of 1% soluble starch solution was added followed by one drop of iodine solution. The tubes were mixed well and results recorded within 10 min
  2. Agar plate method - Isolates were inoculated on Muller Hinton agar containing 1% soluble starch and incubated at 37°C. After 48 h of incubation, the plate was flooded with Penicillin solution containing 10,000 Units per ml and left at room temperature. After 30 min the penicillin solution was decanted completely and the plate was flooded with 1:5 dilution of iodine solution. After 3–5 min results were recorded.


Slime production

It was detected by using Congo red agar (CRA) method by Freeman et al.[18] Brain heart infusion agar containing 5% sucrose, 0.08% Congo red was used for slime detection. The isolates were streaked to a length of 1.5 cm on CRA plate) and incubated at 37°C. Results were recorded after 24 h of incubation.

Biofilm production was determined by Crystal violet Assay as mentioned by Stepnovich et al.[19] Isolated strains were cultured on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) medium for 24 h. Thereafter 3-4 bacterial colonies were inoculated in test tubes containing 10 ml. Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) with 1% glucose and matched to 0.5 McFarland after overnight incubation at 37°C. Further triplicate of 100 μl bacterial suspension of each strains was dispensed into 96-wells sterile cell culture plate and incubated at 37°C. After 24 h of incubation the wells were drained and washed with 0.2 ml of phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.2) for four times. The wells were fixed by 2% sodium acetate and 0.1% crystal violet stain was added. The plate was incubated for further 5 min at room temperature before removing the Crystal violet. The wells were washed with deionized water twice and after drying 95% ethanol was added to each well. Thereafter the plate was kept at 4°C and using spectrophotometer the absorbance at 595 nm was measured [Figure 1]. Optical density (OD) value of ≥3.0 was taken as the upper limit. The OD of the test strains was compared with OD cut off value (ODc). The ODc was calculated as the average OD of negative control + 3x standard deviation (SD) of negative control. S. aureus ATCC 35556 strain was used as a positive control for biofilm production and sterile TSB medium as negative control. All dehydrated media, reagents and antibiotic disks were procured from Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Figure 1: Microtitre plate after staining with 0.1% crystal violet assay

Click here to view


Statical analysis

Data was entered and stored in M.S. Excel sheet and analyzed by using SPSS version 21. Statistical test (chi) 2 was used for analyzing qualitative variable and two tailed Student 't' test for quantitative variable. P < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.


  Results Top


All of the volunteers were found to be carriers of Staphylococcus species as revealed by culture characteristics, Gram staining, and catalase test. Out of them 53 (29.28%) were carriers for S. aureus and 128 (70.72%) were carriers of CONS. The carrier rate of S. aureus was observed higher among the exposed group (37.38%) in comparison to unexposed group (17.57%).

High rates of resistance was observed against ampicillin, penicillin, cotrimoxazole, and erythromycin while amikacin, linezolid, teicoplanin, and vancomycin were susceptible to all the strains [Figure 2]. Cefoxitin disk (30 μg) was used to screen MRSA and was confirmed by latex agglutination test for detection of PBP2a.
Figure 2: Number of S.aureus isolates in each average optical density value after testing in triplicates by 0.1% crystal violet assay.

Click here to view


The hospital unexposed group was represented by 74 (40.88%) students from first year batch of which 13 (17.57%) were found to be carrier of S. aureus. Out of 13 carriers, three (23.08%) were males and 10 (76.92%) were females. All the 13 strains did not show any resistance towards cefoxitin disc (i.e., no MRSA found).

Students studying in second year onward batches represented the hospital exposed group as they are posted in various wards and OPD where they come in contact with patients on day today basis. A total of 107 (59.12) students were included in hospital-exposed group. S. aureus nasal carriage were recorded in 40 (37.38%) students out of which 14 (35%) were females and 26 (65%) were males. Only one (2.5%) strain found to be resistant towards cefoxitin (i.e., MRSA). The student with MRSA nasal carriage was resampled. Second sample also resulted in the growth of MRSA with identical biochemical reactions, antibiogram and latex agglutination test for PBP2a.

Despite of their antibiogram, all the S. aureus isolates were tested for Beta-lactamase production by Test Tube and Agar Plate Iodometric techniques. In test tube iodometric technique an instant discoloration was observed and on Muller hinton agar containing 1% soluble starch >10 mm diameter discoloration around the culture was seen. Beta-lactamase production was found in 48 strains (90.57%) by both the methods.

Slime layer production on CRA was observed in 39 (73.58%) strains. Slime layer productions were recorded as negative (n = 14), weak positive (n = 22), positive (n = 6), and strongly positive (n=11) on the basis of color and consistency of colonies. Strongly positive results for slime layer production by CRA was seen in 11 strains and all of these strains also had high OD value of 3.0 and above by 0.1% Crystal Violet Assay [Figure 3]. There were 12 strains having average OD value between 2.0 and 2.99 out of which three were positive by CRA, five were weakly positive while four strains tested negative.
Figure 3: Antibiotic susceptibility and resistance pattern of isolated S.aureus strains

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


For first year of their course, medical students are not posted for clinical duties. Second year onwards they are posted in different clinical departments during which they get exposed to hospital environment. Medical students included in present study have daily clinical exposure at HNB base hospital until the completion of their course.

The present study reveals that 29.28% of medical students in Garhwal region, unexposed (17.57%) and unexposed (37.38%) to the hospital environment, harbored S. aureus in their nares. Many published data on nasal carriage of S. aureus among normal healthy population presents the carrier rate of 10–30% and is similar to present study. The overall nasal carriage rate was observed higher in males (32.58%) in comparison to females (26.09%). The gender ratio of S. aureus nasal carriage was seen opposite among hospital exposed and unexposed group. Among the hospital unexposed group females (24.39%) harbored S. aureus comparatively higher than males (9.10%) while among the hospital exposed group the rate of S. aureus nasal carriage was very high in males (46.43%) than females (27.45%). Since the unexposed group represents the community, the results of present study suggests that the nasal carriage of S. aureus in general population/community (17.57%) is quite less and it increases with more and more exposure to hospital environment, as suggested by Chen CS et al.[13] Similarly, in the present study the nasal carriage rate increases with longer duration of hospital exposure. There were 38 medical students from second year batch who participated in this study, out of which 11 (28.95%) were found to harbor S. aureus in their anterior nares. From third year batch 57 medical students volunteered among whom 27 (47.37%) were observed as nasal carriers of S. aureus. The Sample size was too less in fourth- and fifth-year batches (5 & 7 students respectively) to comment on.

Slime layer production was observed to be more prevalent in S. aureus isolated from hospital unexposed group suggesting them to be hospitals strains which indicates the potential possibility of implant associated infections, if such strains get transmitted from carrier medical students to the patients.

Thein vitro biofilm production quantified by 0.1% Crystal Violet Assay was correlated with slime layer production by CRA. All the 11 strains of S. aureus producing very strong slime layer on CRA were seen having OD value of more than equal to 3.0 by Crystal Violet Assay. Among the 12 strains having OD value between 2.0 and 2.99, three were positive in CRA while five were weak positive and four were negative. This result suggests that strong biofilm producing strains can have good result in CRA method but strains with weaker ability to form biofilm may be missed by CRA method. The strains having the ability to form weak biofilm can more efficiently be detected by 0.1% Crystal Violet Assay. Sander Croes et al. suggested no relation between the results of CRA and Crystal Violet Assay as the sensitivity and specificity of CRA for S. aureus was approximately 9% and 90%, respectively.[20]

The MRSA strain in the present study failed to form any slime layer on CRA while 0.1% Crystal Violet Assay has detected the biofilm production by it. It has been suggested by many authors that prevalence of slime layer production by MRSA is quite less than MSSA.[20],[21],[22] So, Crystal Violet Assay remains a better method for the detection of biomass. CRA screening forms no alternative for Crystal Violet Assay to detect biofilm formation, as already strongly suggested by few authors.[20],[21],[22],[23] Though there was high consistency reported between CRA and Crystal Violet Assay by studies done by Grinholc et al. and Jain et al. 96% and 91%, respectively, but their definition of slime layer production was based on the color of the colonies and not on the morphology.[24],[25]

Among S. aureus, the methicillin-resistant strains make the management of patients difficult specially in critical care units. MRSA has also gained importance in geriatrics medicine as it has been associated with higher mortality rates in elderly patients even after using anti-MRSA therapy.[12] In this study, the prevalence of MRSA among the anterior nares of the healthy medical students of was found too far lower than other studies on the medical students and healthcare workers from other parts of India.[26],[27],[28] The student with MRSA nasal carriage was advised for mupirocin ointment treatment. After a period of 45 days, one more sample was collected and cultured, where no S. aureus was isolated.

The antibiotics susceptibility pattern of S. aureus isolated from anterior nares of healthy healthcare workers of Pokhra, Nepal and healthy Medical students Puducherry does not vary from the present study.[26],[29] The difference was observed only in thein vitro activity of Penicillin at Puducherry, where Penicillin was found more susceptible. As Srinagar is more proximal to Pokhra in spite of belonging to different countries, both towns share similar geographical conditions, the antibiogram pattern was compared with studies of Sah et al.[27]

Beta-lactamase production was noted in 48 strains (90.57%). Similar finding was given by Shanmugam et al.[26] Beta-lactamase production was seen higher among the hospital exposed students, as these students might harbor the hospital strains in their anterior nares. Beta-lactamase production was recorded higher than the rate of slime layer production by CRA.

Limitation

Molecular identification of mec A gene was not performed to confirm the methicillin resistance due to lack of molecular diagnostic facilities at our center. A long duration study with sampling at regular interval could be performed on a batch of medical students for better identification of the impact of hospital exposure time duration on acquiring S. aureus nasal carriage.


  Conclusion Top


The nasal carriage rate of S. aureus in healthy community is low but the incidence of nasal carriage rate increases with the duration of hospital exposure. The prevalence of MRSA carriage is comparatively very low among medical students in the Garhwal region of Uttarakhand state.

High rate of beta-lactamase production by the S. aureus isolated in present study suggests these strains are acquired from hospital environment. The high prevalence of biomass formation in isolated strains indicates the potential possibility of acquiring implant associated infections, if such bacterial strains get transmitted from carrier students to their patients. Such strains are difficult to manage and can be a cause of higher mortality especially among elderly, immunocompromised and critically ill patients.

Hence, it would be imperative to screen all healthcare workers, interns and admitted patients for MRSA carriage and to treat all those who are found positive for the same.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge the technical staff of the Dept. of Microbiology, V.C.S.G.G.I.M.S & R, Srinagar Garhwal for the technical help extended to carry out this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

The authors thank the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India for considering the project for approval under ICMR, Short Term Studentship Project for the year 2013-14 (ICMR STS ID: 2013-O1173)

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Mainous AG, Hueston WJ, Everett CJ, Diaz VA. Nasal carriage of staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S aureus in the United States, 2001-2002. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:132-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Foster TJ. The staphylococcus aureus “superbug.”. J Clin Invest 2004;114:1693-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Steinberg JP, Clark CC, Hackman BO. Nosocomial and community-acquired staphylococcus aureus bacteremias from 1980 to 1993: Impact of intravascular devices & Methicillin resistance. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:255-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Treakle AM, Thom KA, Furuno JP, Strauss SM, Harris AD, Perencevich EN. Bacterial contamination of health care workers' white coats. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:101-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Vikrant N. Staphylococcus aureus: An invincible bug. Curr Trends Biomed Eng Biosci 2017;5:555672.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sowash MG, Uhlemann AC. Community-associated methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus case studies. Methods Mol Biol 2014;1085:25-69.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sit PS, Teh CSJ, Idris N, Sam IC, Syed Omar SF, Sulaiman H, et al. Prevalence of methicillin-resistance staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection and the molecular characteristics of MRSA bacterimia over a two-year period in a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia. BMC Infect Dis 2017;17:274.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Stapleton PD, Taylor PW. Methicillin resistance in staphylococcus aureus: mechanisms and modulation. Sci Prog 2002;85:57-72.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Shrijana G, Pema YB, Jagat P, Mukhopadhyay C, Uttarn P. Community acquired methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus in new patients attending a government hospital in Gangtok, Sikkim. J Pharm Biomed Sci 2012;19:1-3.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Johnson AP. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus: The European landscape. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:43-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Jian Y, Lv H, Liu J, Huang Q, Liu Y, Liu Q, et al. Dynamic changes of staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid in a central teaching hospital in Shanghai, China, 2008-2018. Front Microbiol 2020;11:908.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Jones BE, Ying J, Stevens V, Haroldsen C, He T, Nevers M, et al. Empirical anti-MRSA vs standard antibiotic therapy and risk of 30-day mortality in patients hospitalized for pneumonia. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:552-60.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Chen CS, Chen CY, Huang YC. Nasal carriage rate and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus among medical students at a Taiwanese University. Int J Infect Dis 2012;16:799-803.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Al-Anazi AR. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in a teaching hospital in Riyadh Saudi Arabia. Biomed Res 2009;20:7-14.  Back to cited text no. 14
  [Full text]  
15.
Krishnamurthy V, Saha A, Renushri BV, Nagaraj ER. Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus carriage, antibiotic resistance and molecular pathogenicity among healthy individuals exposed and not exposed to hospital environment. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:DC04-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Evillard M, Martin Y, Hidri N, Boussougant Y, Joly-Guillou M. Carriage of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus among hospital employees: Prevalence, duration and transmission to households. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:114-20.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bidya S, Suman RS. Comparative study of three β lactamase test methods in staphylococcus aureus isolated from two Nepalese hospitals. Open J Clin Diagn 2014;4:47-52.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Freeman DJ, Falkiner FR, Keane CT. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol 1989;42:872-4.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Stepanović S, Vuković D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukić S, Cirković I, et al. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: Overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 2007;115:891-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Croes S, Deurenberg RH, Boumans M-LL, Beisser PS, Neef C, Stobberingh EE. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation at the physiologic glucose concentration depends on the S. aureus lineage. BMC Microbiol 2009;9:229.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Knobluch JK, Horsetkotte MA, Rohde H, Mack D. Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in staphylococcus aureus. Med Microbiol Immunol 2002;191:101-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Mathur T, Singhal S, Khan S, Upadhyay DJ, Fatma T, Rattan A. Detection of biofilm formation among the clinical isolates of staphylococci: An evaluation of three different screening methods. Indian J Med Microbiol 2006;24:25-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
23.
Rode TM, Langsrud S, Holck A, Møretrø T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 2007;116:372-83.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Grinholc M, Wegryzn G, Kurlenda J. Evaluation of biofilm production and prevalence of the ica D gene in methicillin-resistant and susceptible staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients with nosocomial infections and carriers. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2007;50:375-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Jain A, Agarwal A. Biofilm production, a marker of pathogenic potential of colonizing and commensal staphylococci. J Microbiol Methods 2009;76:88-92.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Shanmugam J, Gopal R, Senthil Kumar S. Prevalence, antibiogram & characterization of S. aureus including MRSA among hospital staff, Medical students & patients from Sri Manakula Vinayagar medical college and hospital (SMVMCH), Puducherry. DSTE Project Report, India. 2009. Available at: http://drugstorepdfsearch.com/d/dste.puducherry.gov.in1.html [Last Accessed on 11 May 2020].  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
M R, D'Souza M, Kotigadde S, Saralaya K V, Kotian MS. Prevalence of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus carriage amongst health care workers of critical care units in Kasturba Medical College Hospital, Mangalore, India. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2697-700.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Agarwal L, Singh AK, Sengupta C, Agarwal A. Nasal carriage of Methicillin- and Mupirocin-resistant S. aureus among health care workers in a tertiary care hospital. J Res Pharm Pract 2015;4:182-6.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
29.
Sah P, Rijal KR, Shakhya B, Tiwari BR, Ghimire P. Nasal carriage rate of staphylococcus aureus in hospital personnel of National Medical College and Teaching Hospital and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences 2013;3:21-3.  Back to cited text no. 29
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed33    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded9    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal