Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 14714
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 2092-2098  

Prevalence and predictors of using complementary and alternative medicine among diabetic patients in Taif city, Saudi Arabia


Department of Family Medicine, Al-Hada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif City, Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission24-Dec-2019
Date of Decision30-Dec-2019
Date of Acceptance12-Feb-2020
Date of Web Publication30-Apr-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rehab I Abdullah
Department of Family Medicine, Al-Hada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1222_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Saudi Arabia has the second-highest rate of diabetes in the Middle East. Herbal treatment is the most used complementary and alternative therapy among Saudi diabetic patients. Little is known about the use of complementary and alternative medicine among diabetic patients who reside in Taif city. Method: This study evaluated the magnitude and correlates of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among diabetic patients attending diabetic clinics and primary healthcare in two governmental hospitals, namely, Prince Mansour Military Hospital (PMMH) and National Gourd Hospital (NGH) in Taif city. Results: CAM prevalence was 33.7%, of whom 87.3% did not consult a doctor before use and 43.2% had more than one source of information while 62.7% used more than one CAM method. Around 49.2% reported that it is very useful, and 72.9% did not notice any side effect from its use. In addition, 47.5% would recommend CAM to other diabetic patients. All (100%) reported using bitter apple, 66.1% reported using cinnamon, 55.1% used ginger, 35.6% took fenugreek, and 21.2% reported using Garlic as an only CAM. Female gender, family history, diabetic complications, and longer duration of diabetes were associated with the increased use of CAM. Discussion and Conclusion: CAM use by diabetic patients in Taif is prevalent. Health education and the safe use of CAM is much needed. Appropriate efforts from the government to integrate CAM into conventional diabetes treatment should be considered.

Keywords: Alternative, complementary, diabetic, predictors, prevalence, Saudi Arabia, Taif


How to cite this article:
Abdullah RI, Allah AA, Mubarak AS, Abdullah RI, Alzhrani SH, Alsufyani MH, Alharthi SJ, Althomali RO. Prevalence and predictors of using complementary and alternative medicine among diabetic patients in Taif city, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:2092-8

How to cite this URL:
Abdullah RI, Allah AA, Mubarak AS, Abdullah RI, Alzhrani SH, Alsufyani MH, Alharthi SJ, Althomali RO. Prevalence and predictors of using complementary and alternative medicine among diabetic patients in Taif city, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 May 9];9:2092-8. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2020/9/4/2092/283415




  Introduction Top


Diabetes mellitus (DM) was estimated to have affected 451 million people in 2017 worldwide, with a projection of 693 million by 2045.[1] Diabetes affects over 34% of the Saudi population.[2]

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Saudi Arabia has the second-highest rate of diabetes in the Middle East and the seventh highest in the world with an expected population of 7 million living with diabetes and more than 3 million with prediabetes.[3],[4] This presents an urgent and enormous public health issue.

Complementary medicine practices have numerous definitions. WHO defined the term traditional and complementary medicine (T and CM): "Traditional medicine is the total knowledge of health-related practices and skills based on indigenous beliefs and experiences," while "complementary medicine is the various health-related practices that are not part of that country's own tradition or conventional medicine."[5]

Complementary therapies have been defined by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) as "health approaches outside of the mainstream western medicine." As of lately, the NCCIH classified complementary medicine into three classifications: natural products, mind and body practices, and other complementary health approaches.[6]

The utilization of T and CM among diabetic patients worldwide has been reported to be between 18% and 72.8%. Most utilized complementary therapies were herbs, dietary supplements, nutritional counseling, spiritual healing, and relaxation techniques.[7]

There is insufficient data to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among Saudi diabetic patients who live in Taif city. Information related to prevalence of CAM utilization, the causes and modes for use, and patient's disclosure of such use would help protect the health of patients, improve the patient-provider correspondence and coordination, and help incorporate CAM therapies into mainstream medicine.

Our study aimed to evaluate the magnitude and correlates of CAM use among diabetic patients attending diabetic clinics and primary healthcare in two government hospitals in Taif city, Saudi Arabia.


  Methodology Top


This is a descriptive cross-sectional investigation conducted between February and June 2019 on diabetic patients attending primary health clinics of National Guards and Military Hospitals in Taif, Saudi Arabia. Systematic random sampling was used for recruiting adult diabetic patients, waiting for their turn to be seen by their family physician, on randomly selected days.

The survey questionnaire was carefully designed by the research team that included nursing staff, family physician, and diabetologist. The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by an expert panel of a physician. The original version of the questionnaire was written in English and subsequently translated to Arabic (since all of the patients spoke Arabic). The translated Arabic version was back-translated by a professional translator to ensure the parallel-form reliability of the questionnaire, to the grantee that all questions were properly translated, and to check the translation quality. The original and back-translated version was reviewed for consistency in meaning by two bilingual experts. A pilot study was conducted with 15 selected diabetic patients to ensure that the target population understood the questions and that the answers yielded the required data. Questionnaires were filled out through a face-to-face interview taking an average of 5–10 min to complete. Weekly meetings of the research team were held to ensure inter-rater reliability and adherence to data collection protocol.

The data were checked for completeness, and responses were coded and entered into the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software version 25 for windows. Frequencies and percentages were used to assess the qualitative variable (the prevalence, types, mode, and patterns of CAM). Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used to chart comparisons of categorical and continuous variables between users and nonusers of CAM. The binary logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the independent predictors with its odds ratios for our binary outcome. The statistical significance was considered with a P value of <0.05.

Ethical approval was granted from the Regional Research and Ethics Committee in Taif and Alhada Armed Hospitals. The approval was granted on February 1st, 2019.


  Results Top


In the present study, 54.6% constituted females. As per [Table 1], the mean age of the participants was (60.37 ± 12.25 years), most of them were not educated (37.4%), not working (52.9%), married (98%), and most of them (62%) had an income less than 5000 INR. All the studied patients were of type 2 diabetes.
Table 1: Descriptive data of the participants

Click here to view


Moreover, [Table 2] demonstrates that the mean age at diagnosis of diabetes among the participants was (45.6 ± 13.3 years), with 56% of the participants had a comorbid chronic disease. Around 39.7% had diabetes for 9 to 12 years, 66.3% had an FH of diabetes, and 40.6% were on both insulin and oral hypoglycemic pills for diabetes control. Of the participants, 58% had at least one diabetic complications (of them, the most common was the eye complications).
Table 2: Clinical character of diabetes among studied patients (No: 350)

Click here to view


As for CAM use, the prevalence was 33.7% with 87.3%, not consulting doctor prior to CAM use. CAM use was mostly for over 1 year, with 43.2% having more than one source of information regarding herbal medicines. As for the reason for CAM use, 58.5% reported believing in their advantages [Table 3].
Table 3: Prevalence of CAM use, consulting a doctor before use, duration of its usage, source of information about herbal medicine, and why using the CAM among the studied CAM users participants (No: 118)

Click here to view


The mean cost of the CAM was (44.58 ± 64.25 SAR). Around 25.4% of participants expected lowering blood glucose level but 20.3% reported that they felt no change after their use. However, 49.2% of the sample reported that CAM was very useful, and 72.9% did not notice any side effect from CAM use, 49.2% were willing to reuse the CAM in the future, and 47.5% recommended CAM to fellow diabetic patients [Table 4].
Table 4: Experience of CAM use among studied CAM users (No: 118)

Click here to view


Among patients surveyed, 62.7% used more than one CAM, 100% used bitter apple, 66.1% took cinnamon, 55.1% consumed ginger, 35.6% had fenugreek, and 21.2% reported using garlic as an only CAM. The rest of the CAM was used under 20% of the participants [Table 5].
Table 5: Detailed distribution of the CAM used among studied patients (No: 118)

Click here to view


As for the CAM nonusers, 16.4% reported that their cause was not the prescription by the doctor. Whereas 84.1% of them were not willing to use CAM in the future [Table 6]. Female patients were more likely to use CAM compared to males (41.9% vs. 23.9%) (P = <0.05). While the association between CAM use and other sociodemographic characteristics was not significant (age, education, occupation, income, comorbid illness, or marital status) (P =>0.05) [Table 7].
Table 6: Attitude of CAM nonuser participants towards CAM use (No: 232)

Click here to view
Table 7: Relationship between CAM use and sociodemographic characters of studied participants (No.:118)

Click here to view


CAM use was higher when family history of diabetes was present (38.8% vs. 23.7%) (P = <0.05), see [Table 8]. Participants with longer duration of diabetes, and those with at least one diabetic complication were more likely to use CAM (P = < 0.05). When adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors simultaneously, as per [Table 9] female gender, duration of diabetes, and having at least one diabetic complication were independent predictors for CAM use.
Table 8: Relationship between CAM use and clinical character of diabetes among studied participants (No: 118)

Click here to view
Table 9: Binary logistic regression analysis regarding the risk factors for CAM use among studied participants

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In our current study, both sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants were comparable to findings from previous regional surveys, particularly in terms of female predominance,[8] rate and nature of diabetes complications and comorbidities,[9],[10] onset age,[11] and family history.[12]

One key finding in our present study is the prevalence of 33.7% of CAM use among diabetes clinics' attendees in Taif city. This is clearly consistent with the rates (32.18%) and (30.5%) of herbal medicines' use reported in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in 2018 and 2016, respectively.[6],[13] In Taif, a similar investigation reported 24.6% prevalence of herbs use among diabetic subjects [14] whereas in Mecca, a rate of 30.1% was uncovered.[15] Similarly, our results agree with the overall (36.95%) prevalence of CAM uptake among Saudi general public.[16]

However, rates of CAM use in Saudi Arabia, as confirmed by our current results, fall below the rates reported internationally in India,[17] Malaysia,[18] Bahrain,[19] Oman [19] and Lebanon.[20] It may be difficult to explain variations in herbal medicine uptake across different countries. Differences in sociocultural perceptions of CAM use, their availability, their accessibility, in addition to differences in study design, and CAM definition could have all contributed to differences in prevalence rates reported in different studies.

The striking results of our survey are the strong belief by people in Taif region that CAM is very advantageous. This belief, in addition to accessibility and lower cost of CAM, may have contributed to the increased rate of CAM use in our study sample.

Furthermore, we found that spiritual healing was used by a significant proportion of T2DM patients (12.7%). A previous cross-sectional study in Riyadh city found that 10.8% of diabetic participants were using spiritual healing (ruqia).[13]

CAM has wide acceptance in the Saudi population. This might be explained by strong religious views that many of the patients base their CAM use on, and possibly lack of awareness regarding the potential for serious side effects and complications. People also are unaware of the poor evidence that supports CAM use. Being illiterate and born in a village were found to bear a significant association with CAM use in Saudi Arabia.[21]

In agreement with previous studies, we found only a worrying minority of 12.7% who consulted a doctor before using CAM.[15],[22],[23] This result reinforces how inadequate doctor-patient (and pharmacist-patient) relationship leads to concealment of CAM use. In Taif, CAM is often recommended by friends and peers who provide information regarding the benefit of CAM use in exclusion of physicians and pharmacists.[14] Routine inquiry about CAM use should be adopted in clinical encounters, given the popularity of this practice.

Indicative of a high level of satisfaction with CAM use, 47.5% of our sample would recommend their use. Such a trend was established across international studies.[16],[17] Some 58.5% of our participants believed in a positive effect for CAM, with only 9.3% attributed any adverse effect to CAM. This is also a consistent finding in many global surveys of CAM-related behaviors and attitudes.[24],[25] Qualitative studies with comprehensive thematic analysis are required to further understand the underpinning concepts of such beliefs.

Female patients and those with a positive family history of complications of diabetes, in the sample we surveyed, were more likely to use CAM, as established in many other studies.[26],[27] Clearly, the use of CAM by a family member or perception of conventionally untreated complication could pressurize patients in seeking help from CAM. Affordability of CAM was also established to motivate their use.[28] T2DM,[29] lower education,[24] and female gender [30] were established factors associated with CAM use. The findings from our investigation certainly confirm such an association in Saudi society.

Bitter apple, cinnamon, and ginger were the most used CAM methods among our participants. In his earlier survey, Al-Rowais found patients using mainly myrrh (Commiphora molmol), black seeds (Nigella sativa), fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), helteet (Ferula assa-foetida), and aloes (Aloe vera).[22] Same herbs were found in use in more recent investigations in addition to Neem (Azadirachta indica), abundant in Mecca Province.[15],[31],[32]

Family physicians often encounter patients who declare usage of complementary medicinal herbs. It is established that primary care physicians hold fluid and variable views towards alternative medicines use.[33] The need for information about the scale of the issue of CAM use is pressing indeed.

The current study adds to the present evidence regarding the prevalent use of CAM among diabetic patients. It has many strengths including large sample size and use of a comprehensive questionnaire. However, one limitation should be allowed before generalizing its results. Social desirability and recall bias may have underestimated the overall CAM prevalence, and future research may have to be community-based rather than hospital-based.


  Conclusion Top


The use of CAM therapies among T2DM patients in Taif is prevalent. Hence, decision-makers should consider the potential risks and benefits of CAM therapies. A concerted effort by the government, orders and syndicates, medical, nursing and health schools, and educational institutions is required to enhance education about the safe use of CAM and sharing their use with their family physician should be encouraged with all diabetic patients. Future studies should be large-scale, community-based to validate the findings of this current investigation.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;138:271-81.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Al Mansour MA. The prevalence and risk factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DMT2) in a semi-urban Saudi population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;17:7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Al Dawish MA, Robert AA, Braham R, Al Hayek AA, Al Saeed A, Ahmed RA, et al. Diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia: A review of the recent literature. Curr Diabetes Rev 2016;12:359-68.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Robert AA, Al Dawish MA, Braham R, Musallam MA, Al Hayek AA, Al Kahtany NH. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia: Major challenges and possible solutions. Curr Diabetes Rev 2017;13:59-64.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014-2023. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Alsanad S, Aboushanab T, Khalil M, Alkhamees OA. A descriptive review of the prevalence and usage of traditional and complementary medicine among Saudi diabetic patients. Scientifica (Cairo) 2018;2018:6303190.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Chang HY, Wallis M, Tiralongo E. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among people living with diabetes: Literature review. J Adv Nurs 2007;58:307-19.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Al-Rubeaan K. National surveillance for type 1, type 2 diabetes and prediabetes among children and adolescents: A population-based study (SAUDI-DM). J Epidemiol Commun Health 2015;69:1045-51.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Alshaikh MK, Filippidis FT, Baldove JP, Majeed A, Rawaf S. Women in Saudi Arabia and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review. J Environ Public Health 2016;2016:7479357.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th ed. 2014. Available from: http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/EN_6E_ Atlas_Full_0.pdf. [Cited 2015 Apr 14].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ahmed RA, Khalil SN, Al-Qahtani MA. Diabetic retinopathy and the associated risk factors in diabetes type 2 patients in Abha, Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med 2016;23:18-24.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Aldossari K, Aldiab A, Al-Zahrani JM, Al-Ghamdi SH, Abdelrazik M, Ali Batais M, et al. Prevalence of prediabetes, diabetes, and its associated risk factors among males in Saudi Arabia: A population-based survey. J Diabetes Res 2018;2018:1-12. Available from: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jdr/2018/2194604.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Al-Eidi S, Tayel S, Al-Slail F, Qureshi NA, Sohaibani I, Khalil M, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus towards complementary and alternative medicine. J Integr Med 2016;14:187-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Algothamy AS, Alruqayb WA, Abdallah MM, Mohamed KA, Albarraq AA, Maghrabi I. Prevalence of using herbal drugs as anti-diabetic agents in Taif Area, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Health Sci 2014;3:137-40.  Back to cited text no. 14
  [Full text]  
15.
Al Saeedi M, El Zubier AG, Bahnassi AA, Al Dawood KM. Patterns of belief and use of traditional remedies by diabetic patients in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J 2003;9:99-107.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mehrotra R, Bajaj S, Kumar D. Use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with diabetes mellitus. Natl Med J India 2004;17:243-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ching SM, Zakaria ZA, Paimin F, Jalalian M. Complementary alternative medicine use among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the primary care setting: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia. BMC Complement Altern Med 2013;13:148-55.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Khalaf AJ, Whitford DL. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with diabetes mellitus in Bahrain: a cross-sectional study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2010;10:35.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Al-Kindi RM, Al-Mushrafi M, Al-Rabaani M, Al-Zakwani I. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults with diabetes in muscat region, Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2011;11:62-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Alghamdi MA, A. Mohammed AG, Alfahaid F, Albshabshe A. Herbal medicine use by Saudi patients with chronic diseases: A cross-sectional study (experience from Southern Region of Saudi Arabia). J Health Spec 2018;6:77-81.  Back to cited text no. 20
  [Full text]  
21.
Almousa H, Rabie F, Alsamghan A, Alsaluli M, Albqami S, Almusa M, et al. Prevalence, types and determinants of complementary and alternative medications among health clinic clients. J Educ Pract 2015;6:51-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Al-Rowais NA. Herbal medicine in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Saudi Med J 2002;23:1327-31.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Salih N, Jasim N. Herbal remedies use among diabetic patients in Nassyria, Iraq. World Fam Med J 2012;316:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Otoom SA, Al-Safi SA, Kerem ZK, Alkofahi A. The use of medicinal herbs by diabetic Jordanian patients. J Herb Pharmacother 2006;6:31-41.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kazmi SY, Sami W, Alharbi SI, Almeshaal M, Alzahrani A, Alyousif F, Alenezi O. Prevalence and perception of CAM usage in Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Majmaah J Health Sci 2018;6:50-61.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Thomson P, Jones J, Evans JM, Leslie SL. Factors influencing the use of complementary and alternative medicine and whether patients inform their primary care physician. Complement Ther Med 2012;1-2:45-53.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Strader DB, Bacon BR, Lindsay KL, Brecque DR, Morgan T, Wright EC, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:2391-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Inhorn MC. Middle Eastern masculinities in the age of new reproductive technologies: Male infertility and stigma in Egypt and Lebanon. Med Anthropol Q 2004;18(Suppl 2):162-82.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Yeh GY, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among persons with diabetes mellitus: Results of a national survey. Am J Public Health 2002;92:1648-52.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Ashur ST, Shah SA, Bosseri S, Shamsuddin K. Use of traditional medicine among type 2 diabetic Libyans. East Mediterr Health J 2017;16;23:375-82.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Al-Garni AM, Al-Raddadi RM, Al-Amri TA. Patterns and determinants of complementary and alternative medicine use among type 2 diabetic patients in a diabetic center in Saudi Arabia: Herbal alternative use in type 2 diabetes. J Fundam Appl Sci 2017;9:1738-48.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Kamel FO, Magadmi RM, Hagras MM, Magadmi B, AlAhmad RA. Knowledge, attitude, and beliefs toward traditional herbal medicine use among diabetics in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2017;29:207-12.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Wardle JL, Sibbritt DW, Adams J. Primary care practitioner perceptions and attitudes of complementary medicine: A content analysis of free-text responses from a survey of non-metropolitan Australian general practitioners. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2018;19:246-55.  Back to cited text no. 33
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Methodology
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1069    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded133    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal