|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 8 | Page : 2671-2675
Physical activity level and its barriers among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending primary healthcare centers in Saudi Arabia
Abdullah M Alzahrani1, Sarrah B. BinSadiq Albakri1, Taher T Alqutub1, Abdulrahman A Alghamdi2, Ali A Rio3
1 King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center; Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of the National Guard – Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2 King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3 King Abdullah International Medical Research Center; Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of the National Guard – Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
|Date of Submission||31-May-2019|
|Date of Decision||27-Jun-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||12-Jul-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Aug-2019|
Abdullah M Alzahrani
Department of Family Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah 23235-8457
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Physical activity (PA) plays an important role in diabetes management. This study aimed to evaluate the level of PA and the barriers toward practicing regular PA among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attending primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in Jeddah during 2018. Materials and Methods: A total of 250 patients were interviewed face-to-face in three PHCs. Two questionnaires were used in this study. The first questionnaire measured the level of PA of the participants. The second questionnaire aimed to identify barriers to PA. For analysis, simple descriptive statistics, Chi-square, T-test, and analysis of variance were used. Results: The prevalence of physical inactivity was found to be 38.4%. Males and females composed 40% and 37.4% of the participants, respectively. Lack of social support, lack of energy, fear of injury, and lack of skills were identified as significant barriers to PA according to the level of PA. Conclusion: Our findings may provide baseline data for future research on this topic and information for healthcare professionals to improve their efforts in promoting the overall health of patients with T2DM.
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, physical activity, primary care, Saudi Arabia
|How to cite this article:|
Alzahrani AM, Albakri SB, Alqutub TT, Alghamdi AA, Rio AA. Physical activity level and its barriers among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending primary healthcare centers in Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:2671-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Alzahrani AM, Albakri SB, Alqutub TT, Alghamdi AA, Rio AA. Physical activity level and its barriers among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending primary healthcare centers in Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2019 [cited 2021 Sep 23];8:2671-5. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2019/8/8/2671/265587
| Introduction|| |
The prevalence of diabetes in adults age 20–79 years old in Saudi Arabia has risen from 13.6% in 2010 to 17.6% in 2015. The financial burden of diabetes in Saudi Arabia is considerably high, costing around 4300 SAR per person. In 2015, the number of deaths among adults in Saudi Arabia due to diabetes was 23,420 people.
Physical activity (PA) has a vital role in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It significantly improves glycemic control, by lowering hemoglobin A1c by an average of 0.6%–0.8%. PA is defined as any bodily movement that substantially increases energy expenditure, whereas “exercise” is the series of planned, structured, and repetitive movements done to develop or maintain physical fitness, which may include cardiovascular, strength, and flexibility training options.
It is recommended to perform at least 150 min of moderate-intensive aerobic activity, or at least 90 min of vigorous aerobic exercise per week. In some patients, PA may be contraindicated, but the new guidelines recommend moderate PA intensity for most patients, particularly those with T2DM. Any PA improves glucose uptake and insulin sensitivity and helps in glucose homeostasis by lowering blood glucose levels for 2–72 h after the last session of activity.
Many studies have reported that minority of patients with T2DM follow these recommendations. In 2015, the prevalence of physical inactivity in Saudi Arabia was found to be 60.1% among males and 72.9% among females.
Several studies in different countries have reported numerous barriers to perform PA in patients with T2DM. Hence, understanding barriers to perform PA among diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia needs to be explored to intervene properly.
This study aimed to evaluate the level of PA among patients with T2DM attending primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in Jeddah during 2018. Also, the barriers toward the practice of PA were explored.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study is a cross-sectional study which was carried out at three PHCs (Specialized Polyclinics, Bahra Center, and Iskan Center) affiliated with the Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs (MNGHA) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The healthcare services provided by the National Guard in Jeddah are dilevered through King Abdulaziz Medical City, including a well-equipped 751-bed hospital, and three PHCs scattered all over Jeddah. These centers provide all medical services under the supervision of family medicine specialists. In each center, there are specialized clinics called chronic diseases clinics, which were the main area for our study. Data collection was conducted using face-to-face interview. Participants were interviewed before entering the clinic while waiting for their medical appointment. A particular private location was selected in each center for the interview.
All adult patients with T2DM who could walk, regardless of their sex and type of management, age between 25 and 75 years, were eligible and invited to participate in this study between February and June 2018. Questionnaires with more than 30% of missing data were excluded from the analysis. This study was approved by King Abdullah International Research Center.
A systematic random sampling technique was used in this study. Chronic diseases clinics in each PHC center are divided into two clinics, one for males and the other for females. Hence, two data collectors including the researcher collected the needed data. Subjects who accepted to participate in the study and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. The first patient was selected randomly using random numbers generated by Microsoft Excel Program, and then every other patient was selected from each clinic. The expected daily number of patients with T2DM attending each clinic ranges between 10 and 15 patients.
Two questionnaires were used in this study. The first questionnaire measured the level of PA of the participants. The second questionnaire was used to measure and identify barriers to PA. The first questionnaire was the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), developed by the World Health Organization for PA surveillance. It collects information on PA participation in three domains as well as sedentary behavior, comprising 16 questions (P1–P16). The domains included were activity at work, activity during travel to and from places, and recreational activities. This questionnaire is available and it is validated in many languages including Arabic language, which was the version we used., When using GPAQ, all the questions must be asked. Skipping any other questions or removing any of the domains will restrict calculation of results.
The second questionnaire which was used to measure the barriers to PA was adopted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The translated and validated Arabic version was used after gaining permission. This questionnaire includes 21 questions for barriers to PA. A scoring system was used to indicate how likely a person would answer each statement about barriers (very likely = 3, somewhat likely = 2, somewhat unlikely = 1, and very unlikely = 0). Scores of three related questions were added together to identify a category as a barrier to PA. The highest possible score of one category was 9. A score of 5/9 or above in any category would indicate a significant barrier.
The estimated total population of adult patients with T2DM attending all PHCs is 15,000. The sample size with estimated prevalence of PA among Saudi population in Jeddah was around 35%, according to the Municipality of Jeddah, with confidence level of 95% and margin of error 6%. The sample size calculation was 240, and then it was increased to 250 to compensate for nonresponse or incomplete data.
Data were encoded and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 21. Measures of central tendency and dispersion (mean, median, standard deviation, and range) were used to describe the numerical data. Categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentage. Independent t-test and analysis of variance tests were used to compare means. Chi-square test was used to measure associations between categorical variables. The statistical significance that was considered is at P value <0.05 and a confidence interval of 95%.
| Results|| |
Demographic profile of participants
The total number of participants from the three centers was 250 subjects [Table 1]. The percentages of participants from each center, Specialized Polyclinics Center, Bahra Center, and Iskan Center, were 47%, 34%, and 19%, respectively. The mean age of those who reported their age, 236 subjects, was 56 ± 9 years.
|Table 1: Sociodemographic profile of the study population according to study location|
Click here to view
The overall prevalence of physical inactivity was found to be 38.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.4%–44.4%]. Inactive males represent 40%, and 37.4% of females were inactive. However, the difference was found to be statistically insignificant. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between physically active and inactive participants according to study location, marital status, and income. On the other hand, age was found to be statistically significant. The number of inactive participants was 92 with a mean age of 58.7 ± 7.5 years, in comparison to the active subjects who were 144, and their mean age was 54 ± 9.9 years (P = 0.0005). The mean difference in age between active and inactive subjects was 4.7 years (95% CI 2.5–7 years). None of the subjects reported that they were practicing vigorous-intensity physical activities at work or as a recreational activity.
Regarding the three questions in the domain “activity at work,” 80 subjects (32%) reported positively to the first question, “does your work involve moderate-intensity activity that causes small increases in breathing or heart rate such as brisk walking [or carrying light loads] for at least 10 minutes continuously?” About the other two questions “In a typical week, on how many days do you do moderate-intensity activities as part of your work?” and “How much time do you spend doing moderate-intensity activities at work on a typical day?” the median days of practicing moderate-intensity physical activities as reported by participants were 5 days/week, with an average of 4 and a range of 3–7 days/week. A total of 17 (21%) participants reported that they perform moderate-intensity activities 7 days/week, and 21 (26%) reported 3 days/week. The median time duration of practicing moderate-intensity activities was 2 h/day and the average being 3.5 with a range of 0.5–4 h/day.
Regarding the domain “travel to and from places,”out of 250 subjects, 114 (45.6%) responded positively to the question “Do you walk or use a bicycle (pedal cycle) for at least 10 min continuously to get to and from places?” The other two questions under this domain, “In a typical week, on how many days do you walk or bicycle for at least 10 min continuously to get to and from places?” and “How much time do you spend walking or bicycling for travel on a typical day?” the median days was 5 days/week, with an average of 6 days ranging from 1 to 7 days/week. The median time duration was 15 min/day, and the average was 45 min with a range of 15 min to 1 h/day.
Considering the domain: “recreational activities,” out of 250 subjects, 141 (56.4%) responded positively to the question “Do you do any moderate-intensity sports, fitness or recreational (leisure) activities that cause a small increase in breathing or heart rate such as brisk walking, [cycling, swimming, volleyball] for at least 10 minutes continuously?” The median days of practicing moderate-intensity recreational activities were 5 days/week, and the range was 2–7 days/week with an average of 5. The median time duration of practicing moderate-intensity recreational activities was 30 min/day, and the average was 1 h and 45 min/day with a range of 15 min to 2 h/day.
Barriers to PA
Barriers to PA are shown in [Figure 1], which are presented in the order from the most common to the least common barrier. [Table 2] shows the barriers to PA according to the level of PA. Barriers to PA according to gender are shown in [Table 3]. These findings were found to be consistent with the previous results shown in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Barriers to physical activity according to the level of physical activity|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
This study aimed to evaluate the level of PA among type 2 diabetic patients and to explore what are the most common barriers among patients with T2DM in Jeddah. Generally, the prevalence of physical inactivity was found to be 38.4%. Males and females who are known to be physically inactive composed 40% and 37.4% of the participants, respectively. Although these findings were found to be statistically insignificant, they are consistent with the findings found in studies conducted in the United States, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and Lebanon. The findings of this study found that age is statistically significant. The number of inactive participants was 92 and their mean age was 58.7 ± 7.5 years, in comparison to the active subjects which were 144 and their mean age was 54 ± 9.9 years.
We found that lack of willpower, lack of energy, lack of skills, lack of social support, and fear of injury are the top barriers to PA among the participants. Lack of willpower and social support were also reported as top barriers to PA in the Saudi population attending primary care by AlQuaiz and Tayel and Alghafri et al. in Muscat, Oman. It was reported in the United States that the most reliable reported barriers to PA among adults with T2DM were pain (41%), followed by lack of willpower (27%) and poor health (21%). However, in this study, lack of willpower was perceived more as a barrier among females than in males.
Interestingly, fear of injury was also reported to be significantly different between individuals at inactive versus active stages of change in PA in a study in Oman, which could be explained by possible physical constraints concerning older age and existing comorbidities in the current study population triggering fear of injuries associated with PA.
Females predominantly reported a lack of social support in a study by Alghafri et al., similar to the result of this study. Meeting cultural norms and social expectations related to safety, security, and conservative dress mainly for females were reported as barriers to PA in South Asian (Pakistani and Indian) British population,, and populations in Arabic countries such as Qatar.
Reports on lack of skills varied across subgroups, in particular older, unemployed, and uneducated individuals. Unlike the study by Alghafri et al., significant scores for lack of time in this study were higher in females compared with males.
Factors which are dependent on an individual's decision-making, such as marital status and income, had no significant associations in the current study. These negative results may vary between studies in different languages due to the wording of the questions and their interpretation. To address these gaps in the literature, a qualitative exploration and further investigation on this matter may be warranted.
In conclusion, this is the first study conducted to identify the barriers to PA among patients with T2DM treated in PHCs in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Although the further research is needed, our findings provide the baseline data as a reference for future research on the topic, as well as information for the healthcare professionals to improve their efforts in promoting the overall health of the patients with T2DM.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Lanhers C, Duclos M, Guttmann A, Coudeyre E, Pereira B, Ouchchane L. General practitioners' barriers to prescribe physical activity: the dark side of the cluster effects on the physical activity of their type 2 diabetes patients. PLoS One 2015;10:e0140429.
Colberg SR. Physical activity: The forgotten tool for type 2 diabetes management. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2012;3:70.
Al-Kaabi J, Al-Maskari F, Saadi H, Afandi B, Parkar H, Nagelkerke N. Physical activity and reported barriers to activity among type 2 diabetic patients in the United Arab Emirates. Rev Diabet Stud 2009;6:271-8.
Al-Zalabani AH, Al-Hamdan NA, Saeed AA. The prevalence of physical activity and its socioeconomic correlates in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional population-based national survey. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2015;10:208-15.
Booth AO, Lowis C, Dean M, Hunter SJ, McKinley MC. Diet and physical activity in the self-management of type 2 diabetes: Barriers and facilitators identified by patients and health professionals. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2013;14:293-306.
Armstrong T, Bull F. Development of the World Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). J Public Health 2006;14:66-70.
Bull F, Maslin T, Armstrong T. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): Nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Activ Health 2009;6:790-804.
Alghafri T, Alharthi SM, Al Farsi YM, Bannerman E, Craigie AM, Anderson AS. Perceived barriers to leisure time physical activity in adults with type 2 diabetes attending primary healthcare in Oman: A cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016946.
Morrato EH, Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Ghushchyan V, Sullivan PW. Physical activity in U.S. adults with diabetes and at risk for developing diabetes, 2003. Diabetes Care 2007;30:203-9.
Al Riyami A, Elaty MA, Morsi M, Al Kharusi H, Al Shukaily W, Jaju S. Oman world health survey: Part 1 – Methodology, sociodemographic profile and epidemiology of non-communicable diseases in oman. Oman Med J 2012;27:425-43.
Al-Nozha MM, Al-Hazzaa HM, Arafah MR, Al-Khadra A, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, et al.
Prevalence of physical activity and inactivity among Saudis aged 30-70 years. A population-based cross-sectional study. Saudi Med J 2007;28:559-68.
Sibai AM, Costanian C, Tohme R, Assaad S, Hwalla N. Physical activity in adults with and without diabetes: From the 'high-risk' approach to the 'population-based' approach of prevention. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1002.
AlQuaiz AM, Tayel SA. Barriers to a healthy lifestyle among patients attending primary care clinics at a university hospital in Riyadh. Ann Saudi Med 2009;29:30-5.
] [Full text]
Thomas N, Alder E, Leese GP. Barriers to physical activity in patients with diabetes. Postgrad Med J 2004;80:287-91.
Plow MA, Allen SM, Resnik L. Correlates of physical activity among low-income older adults. J Appl Gerontol 2011;30:629-42.
Borschmann K, Moore K, Russell M, Ledgerwood K, Renehan E, Lin X, et al.
Overcoming barriers to physical activity among culturally and linguistically diverse older adults: A randomised controlled trial. Australas J Ageing 2010;29:77-80.
Lawton J, Ahmad N, Hanna L, Douglas M, Hallowell N. 'I can't do any serious exercise': Barriers to physical activity amongst people of Pakistani and Indian origin with Type 2 diabetes. Health Educ Res 2006;21:43-54.
Donnelly TT, Al Suwaidi J, Al Enazi NR, Idris Z, Albulushi AM, Yassin K, et al.
Qatari women living with cardiovascular diseases – Challenges and opportunities to engage in healthy lifestyles. Health Care Women Int 2012;33:1114-34.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]