|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 735-738
Bacteriological profile of neonatal sepsis in a secondary care hospital in rural Tamil Nadu, Southern India
Doniparthi Venkata Pavan Kumar1, Jesinth Mohan2, PS Rakesh3, Jasmine Prasad3, Lenikumar Joseph1
1 Department of Pediatrics, Christian Fellowship Hospital, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Pediatrics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Community Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Web Publication||15-Feb-2018|
Dr. Jesinth Mohan
Department of Paediatrics, Unit II, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 632 004, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity in the world. The objective of the current study was to detect the common causative microorganisms of neonatal sepsis and their antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rural secondary hospital in Tamil Nadu, India. Materials and Methods: Neonates (0–28 days) admitted to this newborn care unit from October 2013 to September 2015, with a diagnosis of probable sepsis were studied. All the enrolled babies had blood cultures taken and were followed up till final outcome, which was discharge or death, irrespective of culture result. Univariate analysis was performed for factors associated with culture positivity, generating odds ratios, and confidence intervals. Results: Among the 107 babies with a diagnosis of probable sepsis, 28 (26.2%) had shown bacteria in culture. The majority (94.4%) were of early-onset sepsis. The predominant organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (10/28) and Klebsiella (6/28). 100% of Gram-negative bacilli and 90% of Staphylococcus were resistant to Ampicillin. Gentamicin resistance among Gram-negative bacilli and Staphylococcus was 52.9% and 20%, respectively, while third-generation cephalosporin resistance was 31.2% and 20%, respectively. Among the neonates diagnosed as probable sepsis, idiopathic prematurity (P = 0.007) was found to have a statistically significant association with culture-positive sepsis. Conclusion: The culture positivity rate among the neonates with probable sepsis in the current study was 26%. An alarmingly high degree of antibiotic resistance observed calls for robust infection control practices and an urgent evaluation and development of individual and national antibiotic policies for neonatal sepsis.
Keywords: Antibiotic policy, antimicrobial resistance, neonatal septicemia, prematurity
|How to cite this article:|
Pavan Kumar DV, Mohan J, Rakesh P S, Prasad J, Joseph L. Bacteriological profile of neonatal sepsis in a secondary care hospital in rural Tamil Nadu, Southern India. J Family Med Prim Care 2017;6:735-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Pavan Kumar DV, Mohan J, Rakesh P S, Prasad J, Joseph L. Bacteriological profile of neonatal sepsis in a secondary care hospital in rural Tamil Nadu, Southern India. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Sep 23];6:735-8. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2017/6/4/735/225550
| Introduction|| |
Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of neonatal mortality in the world. It is also one of the common morbidities in neonatal units in India., Majority of neonatal sepsis occurs in developing countries.
Although risk factors attributable to neonatal sepsis, its causative organisms, and their antimicrobial resistance patterns are well described, such evidence is based predominantly on data from tertiary hospitals.,,,, Good laboratory facilities, especially blood culture, are frequently unavailable in the rural healthcare setting, resulting in the nonavailability of relevant data on culture-proven neonatal sepsis. With progress achieved in the past two decades in promoting institutional deliveries among the rural population of India, research on neonatal sepsis in rural hospitals could be a useful addition to medical literature.
The objective of the current study was to detect the common causative microorganisms of neonatal sepsis and their antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rural secondary care hospital in Tamil Nadu, India.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The study was done in the special newborn care unit of a secondary level rural hospital in Tamil Nadu. The hospital has a 55-bedded obstetrics unit and a 10-bedded Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with predominant level II care.
Neonates (0–28 days) admitted to this newborn care unit from October 2013 to September 2015, with a diagnosis of probable sepsis were studied. Outborn babies and babies with gross congenital anomalies were excluded.
Babies with one or more of the following risk factors – maternal fever, prolonged rupture of the membranes for more than 24 h, foul-smelling or meconium-stained liquor, or frequent (>3) unclean vaginal examinations, and/or having severe prematurity, or birth asphyxia necessitating active resuscitation were considered at risk for sepsis and admitted to neonatal unit for observation. All such neonates were monitored daily for signs and symptoms of sepsis. A diagnosis of probable sepsis was made in the presence of a set of clinical signs as per the Young Infant Study Algorithm standard definitions of sepsis, adapted from National Healthcare Safety Network which included tachypnea, respiratory distress, prolonged capillary refill time, abnormal color, abdominal distension, poor sucking, irritability, convulsions, temperature abnormalities, lethargy, or apnea. Blood culture was done for all neonates with a diagnosis of probable sepsis.
Early-onset and late-onset of sepsis were defined as infection within the first 72 h of life and >72 h of life, respectively. Those babies with new onset symptoms and signs suggesting worsening of sepsis during the hospital course were subjected to subsequent blood culture. Detailed history was collected in a pro forma. All the study participants were followed up till final outcome, which was discharge or death, irrespective of culture result.
BACTEC system was used for blood culture. Bottles were incubated in the bactec9050 incubator. After the bottles were flagged positive, Gram-stain was performed from the broth for preliminary identification of the type of organisms isolated. Subcultures were made in blood agar and MacConkey agar and incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h. Organisms were processed for identification. Susceptibility testing was also performed using AST-GP67 card for Gram-positive cocci and AST GN25/N090 for Gram-negative bacilli. Processing was done as per manufacturer's instructions. Cards were loaded onto the VITEC 2 compact (biomerieux) instruments. Culture was reported sterile if there was no growth in 7 days.
Descriptive statistics including frequencies and percentages was done. Univariate analysis was performed for finding factors associated with culture positivity, generating odds ratios, and confidence intervals.
| Results|| |
There were 3114 live births during the study period. Total admissions to newborn unit during the study period were 1070. The study included 107 neonates who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The details of neonatal admissions are shown as a flowchart in [Figure 1].
Of the 107 babies with a diagnosis of probable sepsis, 63 (59%) were males, 27 (25%) were preterm babies, and nine (8.4%) had birth weight <2 kg. The basic characteristics of study neonates are shown in [Table 1].
Among the 107 babies, 28 (26.2%) blood samples had shown bacteria in culture, 13.1% babies had their first culture positive, 13.1% babies had their subsequent culture positive while 73.8% of neonates showed no growth in blood culture. A total of 101 (94.4%) individuals were of early-onset sepsis and 6 (5.6%) individuals were of late-onset sepsis. The predominant organisms identified were Staphylococcus aureus (10/28) and Klebsiella (6/28). The details of organisms isolated are shown in [Table 2].
100% of Gram-negative bacilli and 90% of S. aureus were resistant to Ampicillin. Gentamicin resistance among Gram-negative bacilli and S. aureus was 52.9% and 20%, respectively. The prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance was 20% among S. aureus and 12% among Gram-negative bacilli. None of the S. aureus but 17.6% of Gram-negative bacilli was resistant to Amikacin. In the study, 31.2% of Gram-negative bacilli and 20% of S. aureus were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. The details of antimicrobial resistance are shown in [Table 3].
Among the neonates with a diagnosis of probable sepsis, idiopathic prematurity (P = 0.007) was found to have a statistically significant association with culture-positive sepsis. Details of univariate analysis of factors associated with definitive sepsis are shown in [Table 4].
|Table 4: Univariate analysis of factors associated with culture-positive sepsis|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The culture positivity rate among the neonates with probable sepsis in the current study was 26%. In previous studies done in India, it has ranged from 16% to 54%.,,,,, The culture positivity might be an underestimation of actual status in our study, as anaerobic organisms were not tested in our institution. Outborn babies were excluded from our study due to difficulties in obtaining accurate antenatal and perinatal data.
Most common isolates in this study were S. aureus and Klebsiella spp. A review of studies on neonatal sepsis in India has found that Klebsiella species (15 studies), Escherichia More Details coli (10 studies), and S. aureus (ten studies) were the most common isolates. Nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli which are recently emerging in NICUs were few in number. One reason for this could be that the unit studied is of level II and interventions such as insertion of central vascular catheters were not performed in this unit. This study was characterized by the absence of Group B Streptococcus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CONS). Infection with CONS is usually associated with the use of interventions, such as central vascular catheters, which was not prevalent in the unit studied.
The proportion of early-onset sepsis in other studies in India ranged from 10.4% to 85.0% of total neonatal sepsis. The incidence of late-onset sepsis might have been underestimated because the neonates were not followed up after discharge from the hospital. However, the high rate of early-onset sepsis and the apparent dominance of so-called nosocomial-type pathogens in early-onset sepsis could possibly be due to ultra-early horizontal transmission from delivery rooms and NICUs or vertical transmission from the maternal genital tract colonized with these pathogens after unhygienic personal and obstetric practices. The study warrants the need for further research to understand the pathogenesis of early-onset sepsis, including its association with obstetric and neonatal care practices around birth.
The results are consistent with a high degree of antibiotic resistance reported in other studies from India.,,,, The findings also underscore the need for action to contain the increasing problems of antimicrobial resistance.
Easy availability and widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the presumptive treatment of infections prevail in India. Blood culture facilities are not often available in most of the settings in rural areas. In such scenarios, clinicians have to depend on empirical antibiotic regimens. The high prevalence of resistance to Ampicillin makes it out of use in neonatal sepsis even in rural hospitals. The increasing resistance of Gram-negative organisms to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems makes the choice of antibiotics difficult. Due consideration needs to be given to antistaphylococcal antibiotics in view of its high prevalence in both early-onset and late-onset neonatal sepsis.
Factor shown to be significantly associated with culture-positive sepsis was prematurity. None of the studied maternal factors had shown any significant association with culture-positive sepsis. Prematurity should be given more weightage in scoring systems assessing sepsis risk.
| Conclusion|| |
Data on culture-positive neonatal sepsis are limited from rural secondary care centers in India. S. aureus and Klebsiella spp. were the most common cause of neonatal sepsis in our setup. An alarmingly high degree of antibiotic resistance observed calls for an urgent evaluation and development of individual and national antibiotic policies and protocols for neonatal sepsis. Robust infection control practices in nursery and labor room, minimally invasive procedures, and restricting the use of aminoglycosides and quinolones as first-line antibiotics and carbapenems as second-line antibiotics are practical options to minimize mortality from sepsis.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J, Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet 2005;365:891-900.
Jain A, Awasthi AK, Kumar M. Etiological and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of nosocomial blood stream infections in neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007;25:299-300.
] [Full text]
Kumhar GD, Ramachandran VG, Gupta P. Bacteriological analysis of blood culture isolates from neonates in a tertiary care hospital in India. J Health Popul Nutr 2002;20:343-7.
Thaver D, Zaidi AK. Burden of neonatal infections in developing countries: A review of evidence from community-based studies. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28:S3-9.
Bhat YR, Lewis LE, Vandana KE. Bacterial isolates of early-onset neonatal sepsis and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern between 1998 and 2004: An audit from a center in India. Ital J Pediatr 2011;37:32.
Zakariya BP, Bhat V, Harish BN, Arun Babu T, Joseph NM. Neonatal sepsis in a tertiary care hospital in South India: Bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Indian J Pediatr 2011;78:413-7.
Kaistha N, Mehta M, Singla N, Garg R, Chander J. Neonatal septicemia isolates and resistance patterns in a tertiary care hospital of North India. J Infect Dev Ctries 2009;4:55-7.
Investigators of the Delhi Neonatal Infection Study (DeNIS) collaboration. Characterisation and antimicrobial resistance of sepsis pathogens in neonates born in tertiary care centres in Delhi, India: A cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2016;4:e752-60.
Viswanathan R, Singh AK, Ghosh C, Dasgupta S, Mukherjee S, Basu S, et al.
Profile of neonatal septicaemia at a district-level sick newborn care unit. J Health Popul Nutr 2012;30:41-8.
Jyothi P, Basavaraj MC, Basavaraj PV. Bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2013;4:306-9.
Agnihotri N, Kaistha N, Gupta V. Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates from neonatal septicemia. Jpn J Infect Dis 2004;57:273-5.
Sundaram V, Kumar P, Dutta S, Mukhopadhyay K, Ray P, Gautam V, et al.
Blood culture confirmed bacterial sepsis in neonates in a North Indian tertiary care center: Changes over the last decade. Jpn J Infect Dis 2009;62:46-50.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||MICROORGANISMS IMPLICATED IN NEOTATAL SEPSIS AND THEIR ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY IN A PART OF NORTH EAST INDIA
| ||Murchana Khound,Mritunjay Pao,Sekharjyoti Sharma |
| ||INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. 2021; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Global incidence and mortality of neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
| ||Carolin Fleischmann,Felix Reichert,Alessandro Cassini,Rosa Horner,Thomas Harder,Robby Markwart,Marc Tröndle,Yoanna Savova,Niranjan Kissoon,Peter Schlattmann,Konrad Reinhart,Benedetta Allegranzi,Tim Eckmanns |
| ||Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2021; 106(8): 745 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|