Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 1521
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents 
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 9-14  

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare

Department of Community Medicine, SRM Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Web Publication3-Apr-2013

Correspondence Address:
P Ganeshkumar
Department of Community Medicine, SRM Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.109934

Rights and Permissions

Healthcare decisions for individual patients and for public health policies should be informed by the best available research evidence. The practice of evidence-based medicine is the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research and patient's values and expectations. Primary care physicians need evidence for both clinical practice and for public health decision making. The evidence comes from good reviews which is a state-of-the-art synthesis of current evidence on a given research question. Given the explosion of medical literature, and the fact that time is always scarce, review articles play a vital role in decision making in evidence-based medical practice. Given that most clinicians and public health professionals do not have the time to track down all the original articles, critically read them, and obtain the evidence they need for their questions, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines may be their best source of evidence. Systematic reviews aim to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of all relevant individual studies over a health-related issue, thereby making the available evidence more accessible to decision makers. The objective of this article is to introduce the primary care physicians about the concept of systematic reviews and meta-analysis, outlining why they are important, describing their methods and terminologies used, and thereby helping them with the skills to recognize and understand a reliable review which will be helpful for their day-to-day clinical practice and research activities.

Keywords: Evidence-based medicine, meta-analysis, primary care, systematic review

How to cite this article:
Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. J Family Med Prim Care 2013;2:9-14

How to cite this URL:
Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Sep 22];2:9-14. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2013/2/1/9/109934

  Introduction Top

Evidence-based healthcare is the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. Green denotes, "Using evidence from reliable research, to inform healthcare decisions, has the potential to ensure best practice and reduce variations in healthcare delivery." However, incorporating research into practice is time consuming, and so we need methods of facilitating easy access to evidence for busy clinicians. [1] Ganeshkumar et al. mentioned that nearly half of the private practitioners in India were consulting more than 4 h per day in a locality, [2] which explains the difficulty of them in spending time in searching evidence during consultation. Ideally, clinical decision making ought to be based on the latest evidence available. However, to keep abreast with the continuously increasing number of publications in health research, a primary healthcare professional would need to read an insurmountable number of articles every day, covered in more than 13 million references and over 4800 biomedical and health journals in Medline alone. With the view to address this challenge, the systematic review method was developed. Systematic reviews aim to inform and facilitate this process through research synthesis of multiple studies, enabling increased and efficient access to evidence. [1],[3],[4]

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in healthcare settings. Clinicians read them to keep up-to-date with their field and they are often used as a starting point for developing clinical practice guidelines. Granting agencies may require a systematic review to ensure there is justification for further research and some healthcare journals are moving in this direction. [5]

This article is intended to provide an easy guide to understand the concept of systematic reviews and meta-analysis, which has been prepared with the aim of capacity building for general practitioners and other primary healthcare professionals in research methodology and day-to-day clinical practice.

The purpose of this article is to introduce readers to:

  1. The two approaches of evaluating all the available evidence on an issue i.e., systematic reviews and meta-analysis,
  2. Discuss the steps in doing a systematic review,
  3. Introduce the terms used in systematic reviews and meta-analysis,
  4. Interpret results of a meta-analysis, and
  5. The advantages and disadvantages of systematic review and meta-analysis.

  Application Top

What is the effect of antiviral treatment in dengue fever? Most often a primary care physician needs to know convincing answers to questions like this in a primary care setting.

To find out the solutions or answers to a clinical question like this, one has to refer textbooks, ask a colleague, or search electronic database for reports of clinical trials. Doctors need reliable information on such problems and on the effectiveness of large number of therapeutic interventions, but the information sources are too many, i.e., nearly 20,000 journals publishing 2 million articles per year with unclear or confusing results. Because no study, regardless of its type, should be interpreted in isolation, a systematic review is generally the best form of evidence. [6] So, the preferred method is a good summary of research reports, i.e., systematic reviews and meta-analysis, which will give evidence-based answers to clinical situations.

There are two fundamental categories of research: Primary research and secondary research. Primary research is collecting data directly from patients or population, while secondary research is the analysis of data already collected through primary research. A review is an article that summarizes a number of primary studies and may draw conclusions on the topic of interest which can be traditional (unsystematic) or systematic.

  Terminologies Top

Systematic review

A systematic review is a summary of the medical literature that uses explicit and reproducible methods to systematically search, critically appraise, and synthesize on a specific issue. It synthesizes the results of multiple primary studies related to each other by using strategies that reduce biases and random errors. [7] To this end, systematic reviews may or may not include a statistical synthesis called meta-analysis, depending on whether the studies are similar enough so that combining their results is meaningful. [8] Systematic reviews are often called overviews.

The evidence-based practitioner, David Sackett, defines the following terminologies. [3]

  • Review: The general term for all attempts to synthesize the results and conclusions of two or more publications on a given topic.
  • Overview: When a review strives to comprehensively identify and track down all the literature on a given topic (also called "systematic literature review").
  • Meta-analysis: A specific statistical strategy for assembling the results of several studies into a single estimate.
Systematic reviews adhere to a strict scientific design based on explicit, pre-specified, and reproducible methods. Because of this, when carried out well, they provide reliable estimates about the effects of interventions so that conclusions are defensible. Systematic reviews can also demonstrate where knowledge is lacking. This can then be used to guide future research. Systematic reviews are usually carried out in the areas of clinical tests (diagnostic, screening, and prognostic), public health interventions, adverse (harm) effects, economic (cost) evaluations, and how and why interventions work. [9]

Cochrane reviews

Cochrane reviews are systematic reviews undertaken by members of the Cochrane Collaboration which is an international not-for-profit organization that aims to help people to make well-informed decisions about healthcare by preparing, maintaining, and promoting the accessibility of systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare interventions.

Cochrane Primary Health Care Field is a systematic review of primary healthcare research on prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and diagnostic test accuracy. The overall aim and mission of the Primary Health Care Field is to promote the quality, quantity, dissemination, accessibility, applicability, and impact of Cochrane systematic reviews relevant to people who work in primary care and to ensure proper representation in the interests of primary care clinicians and consumers in Cochrane reviews and review groups, and in other entities. This field would serve to coordinate and promote the mission of the Cochrane Collaboration within the primary healthcare disciplines, as well as ensuring that primary care perspectives are adequately represented within the Collaboration. [10]


A meta-analysis is the combination of data from several independent primary studies that address the same question to produce a single estimate like the effect of treatment or risk factor. It is the statistical analysis of a large collection of analysis and results from individual studies for the purpose of integrating the findings. [11] The term meta-analysis has been used to denote the full range of quantitative methods for research reviews. [12] Meta-analyses are studies of studies. [13] Meta-analysis provides a logical framework to a research review where similar measures from comparable studies are listed systematically and the available effect measures are combined wherever possible. [14]

The fundamental rationale of meta-analysis is that it reduces the quantity of data by summarizing data from multiple resources and helps to plan research as well as to frame guidelines. It also helps to make efficient use of existing data, ensuring generalizability, helping to check consistency of relationships, explaining data inconsistency, and quantifies the data. It helps to improve the precision in estimating the risk by using explicit methods.

Therefore, "systematic review" will refer to the entire process of collecting, reviewing, and presenting all available evidence, while the term "meta-analysis" will refer to the statistical technique involved in extracting and combining data to produce a summary result. [15]

Steps in doing systematic reviews/meta-analysis

Following are the six fundamental essential steps while doing systematic review and meta-analysis. [16]

Define the question

This is the most important part of systematic reviews/meta-analysis. The research question for the systematic reviews may be related to a major public health problem or a controversial clinical situation which requires acceptable intervention as a possible solution to the present healthcare need of the community. This step is most important since the remaining steps will be based on this.

Reviewing the literature

This can be done by going through scientific resources such as electronic database, controlled clinical trials registers, other biomedical databases, non-English literatures, "gray literatures" (thesis, internal reports, non-peer-reviewed journals, pharmaceutical industry files), references listed in primary sources, raw data from published trials and other unpublished sources known to experts in the field. Among the available electronic scientific database, the popular ones are PUBMED, MEDLINE, and EMBASE.

Sift the studies to select relevant ones

To select the relevant studies from the searches, we need to sift through the studies thus identified. The first sift is pre-screening, i.e., to decide which studies to retrieve in full, and the second sift is selection which is to look again at these studies and decide which are to be included in the review. The next step is selecting the eligible studies based on similar study designs, year of publication, language, choice among multiple articles, sample size or follow-up issues, similarity of exposure, and or treatment and completeness of information.

It is necessary to ensure that the sifting includes all relevant studies like the unpublished studies (desk drawer problem), studies which came with negative conclusions or were published in non-English journals, and studies with small sample size.

Assess the quality of studies

The steps undertaken in evaluating the study quality are early definition of study quality and criteria, setting up a good scoring system, developing a standard form for assessment, calculating quality for each study, and finally using this for sensitivity analysis.

For example, the quality of a randomized controlled trial can be assessed by finding out the answers to the following questions:

  1. Was the assignment to the treatment groups really random?
  2. Was the treatment allocation concealed?
  3. Were the groups similar at baseline in terms of prognostic factors?
  4. Were the eligibility criteria specified?
  5. Were the assessors, the care provider, and the patient blinded?
  6. Were the point estimates and measure of variability presented for the primary outcome measure?
  7. Did the analyses include intention-to-treat analysis?
Calculate the outcome measures of each study and combine them

We need a standard measure of outcome which can be applied to each study on the basis of its effect size. Based on their type of outcome, following are the measures of outcome: Studies with binary outcomes (cured/not cured) have odds ratio, risk ratio; studies with continuous outcomes (blood pressure) have means, difference in means, standardized difference in means (effect sizes); and survival or time-to-event data have hazard ratios.

Combining studies

Homogeneity of different studies can be estimated at a glance from a forest plot (explained below). For example, if the lower confidence interval of every trial is below the upper of all the others, i.e., the lines all overlap to some extent, then the trials are homogeneous. If some lines do not overlap at all, these trials may be said to be heterogeneous.

The definitive test for assessing the heterogeneity of studies is a variant of Chi-square test (Mantel-Haenszel test). The final step is calculating the common estimate and its confidence interval with the original data or with the summary statistics from all the studies. The best estimate of treatment effect can be derived from the weighted summary statistics of all studies which will be based on weighting to sample size, standard errors, and other summary statistics. Log scale is used to combine the data to estimate the weighting.

Interpret results: Graph

The results of a meta-analysis are usually presented as a graph called forest plot because the typical forest plots appear as forest of lines. It provides a simple visual presentation of individual studies that went into the meta-analysis at a glance. It shows the variation between the studies and an estimate of the overall result of all the studies together.

Forest plot

Meta-analysis graphs can principally be divided into six columns [Figure 1]. Individual study results are displayed in rows. The first column ("study") lists the individual study IDs included in the meta-analysis; usually the first author and year are displayed. The second column relates to the intervention groups and the third column to the control groups. The fourth column visually displays the study results. The line in the middle is called "the line of no effect." The weight (in %) in the fifth column indicates the weighting or influence of the study on the overall results of the meta-analysis of all included studies. The higher the percentage weight, the bigger the box, the more influence the study has on the overall results. The sixth column gives the numerical results for each study (e.g., odds ratio or relative risk and 95% confidence interval), which are identical to the graphical display in the fourth column. The diamond in the last row of the graph illustrates the overall result of the meta-analysis. [4]
Figure 1: Interpretation of meta-analysis[4]

Click here to view

Thus, the horizontal lines represent individual studies. Length of line is the confidence interval (usually 95%), squares on the line represent effect size (risk ratio) for the study, with area of the square being the study size (proportional to weight given) and position as point estimate (relative risk) of the study. [7]

For example, the forest plot of the effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with placebo in preventing the recurrence of acute severe migraine headache in adults is shown in [Figure 2]. [17]
Figure 2: Forest plot of the effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with placebo in preventing the recurrence of acute severe migraine headache in adults[17]

Click here to view

The overall effect is shown as diamond where the position toward the center represents pooled point estimate, the width represents estimated 95% confidence interval for all studies, and the black plain line vertically in the middle of plot is the "line of no effect" (e.g., relative risk = 1).

Therefore, when examining the results of a systematic reviews/meta-analysis, the following questions should be kept in mind:

  1. Were apples combined with oranges?
    • Heterogeneity among studies may make any pooled estimate meaningless.
  2. Were all of the apples rotten?
    • The quality of a meta-analysis cannot be any better than the quality of the studies it is summarizing.
  3. Were some apples left on the tree?
    • An incomplete search of the literature can bias the findings of a meta-analysis.
  4. Did the pile of apples amount to more than just a hill of beans?
    • Make sure that the meta-analysis quantifies the size of the effect in units that you can understand.
Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis

Subgroup analysis looks at the results of different subgroups of trials, e.g., by considering trials on adults and children separately. This should be planned at the protocol stage itself which is based on good scientific reasoning and is to be kept to a minimum.

Sensitivity analysis is used to determine how results of a systematic review/meta-analysis change by fiddling with data, for example, what is the implication if the exclusion criteria or excluded unpublished studies or weightings are assigned differently. Thus, after the analysis, if changing makes little or no difference to the overall results, the reviewer's conclusions are robust. If the key findings disappear, then the conclusions need to be expressed more cautiously.

  Advantages of Systematic Reviews Top

Systematic reviews have specific advantages because of using explicit methods which limit bias, draw reliable and accurate conclusions, easily deliver required information to healthcare providers, researchers, and policymakers, help to reduce the time delay in the research discoveries to implementation, improve the generalizability and consistency of results, generation of new hypotheses about subgroups of the study population, and overall they increase precision of the results. [18]

  Limitations in Systematic Reviews/Meta-analysis Top

As with all research, the value of a systematic review depends on what was done, what was found, and the clarity of reporting. As with other publications, the reporting quality of systematic reviews varies, limiting readers' ability to assess the strengths and weaknesses of those reviews. [5]

Even though systematic review and meta-analysis are considered the best evidence for getting a definitive answer to a research question, there are certain inherent flaws associated with it, such as the location and selection of studies, heterogeneity, loss of information on important outcomes, inappropriate subgroup analyses, conflict with new experimental data, and duplication of publication.

  Publication Bias Top

Publication bias results in it being easier to find studies with a "positive" result. [19] This occurs particularly due to inappropriate sifting of the studies where there is always a tendency towards the studies with positive (significant) outcomes. This effect occurs more commonly in systematic reviews/meta-analysis which need to be eliminated.

The quality of reporting of systematic reviews is still not optimal. In a recent review of 300 systematic reviews, few authors reported assessing possible publication bias even though there is overwhelming evidence both for its existence and its impact on the results of systematic reviews. Even when the possibility of publication bias is assessed, there is no guarantee that systematic reviewers have assessed or interpreted it appropriately. [20]

To overcome certain limitations mentioned above, the Cochrane reviews are currently reported in a format where at the end of every review, findings are summarized in the author's point of view and also give an overall picture of the outcome by means of plain language summary. This is found to be much helpful to understand the existing evidence about the topic more easily by the reader.

  Summary Top

A systematic review is an overview of primary studies which contains an explicit statement of objectives, materials, and methods, and has been conducted according to explicit and reproducible methodology. A meta-analysis is a mathematical synthesis of the results of two or more primary studies that addressed the same hypothesis in the same way. Although meta-analysis can increase the precision of a result, it is important to ensure that the methods used for the reviews were valid and reliable.

High-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses take great care to find all relevant studies, critically assess each study, synthesize the findings from individual studies in an unbiased manner, and present balanced important summary of findings with due consideration of any flaws in the evidence. Systematic review and meta-analysis is a way of summarizing research evidence, which is generally the best form of evidence, and hence positioned at the top of the hierarchy of evidence.

Systematic reviews can be very useful decision-making tools for primary care/family physicians. They objectively summarize large amounts of information, identifying gaps in medical research, and identifying beneficial or harmful interventions which will be useful for clinicians, researchers, and even for public and policymakers.

  References Top

1.Green S. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Singapore Med J 2005:46;270-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Ganeshkumar P, Arun Kumar S, Rajoura OP. Evaluation of computer usage in healthcare among private practitioners of NCT Delhi. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;169:960-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Sackett D, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn′t. BMJ 1996;312:71-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Ried K. Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs--a practical guide. Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35:635-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Glasziou P, Vanderbroucke J, Chalmers I. Assessing the quality of research. BMJ 2004;328:39-41.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:376-80.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Clarke M. The cochrane collaboration and systematic reviews. Br J Surg 2007;94:391-2.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Systematic Reviews: CRD′s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2008. Published by CRD, University of York January 2009.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Cochrane Primary Health Care Field, The Cochrane Library, The Cochrane Collaboration, 23 rd Mar 2012. Available from: http://www.cochraneprimarycare.org/welcome. [Last accessed on 2012 Apr 30].  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 1976;5:3-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Goldman L, Feinstein AR. Anticoagulants and myocardial infarction. The problems of pooling, drowning, and floating. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:92-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Kassirer JP. Clinical trials and meta-analysis. What do they do for us? N Engl J Med 1992;327:273-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Kavale KA, Glass GV. Meta-analysis and the integration of research in special education. J Learn Disabil 1981;14:531-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.An introduction to meta-analysis, Cochrane Collaboration open learning material for reviewers, Version 1.1, November 2002. Available from: http://www.cochrane-net.org/openlearning/html/mod3-2.htm. [Last accessed on 2013 Jan 15].  Back to cited text no. 15
16.Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2009. Available from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. [Last accessed on 2009 Sep].  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Sedgwick P. Meta-analyses I. BMJ 2011;342:d45. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d45. [Last accessed on 2013 Jan 15].  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Greenhalgh T. Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). BMJ 1997;315:672-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Publication Bias, Cochrane Collaboration open learning material for reviewers, Version 1.1, November 2002. Available from: http://www.cochrane-net.org/openlearning/html/mod15-2.htm. [Last accessed on 2013 Jan 15].  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med 2007;4:e78. Available from: http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi% 2F10.1371%2 Fjournal.pmed.0040078. [Last accessed on 2012 Apr 30].  Back to cited text no. 20


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

This article has been cited by
1 The effects of lemon balm ( Melissa officinalis L.) on depression and anxiety in clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Javid Ghazizadeh,Saeed Sadigh-Eteghad,Wolfgang Marx,Ali Fakhari,Sanaz Hamedeyazdan,Mohammadali Torbati,Somaiyeh Taheri-Tarighi,Mostafa Araj-khodaei,Mojgan Mirghafourvand
Phytotherapy Research. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Conjoint applications of meta-analysis and bioinformatic data toward understanding the effect of nitrate on fish
Lisen Li,Ling Tan,Weining Yang,Xiaoyan Xu,Yubang Shen,Jiale Li
Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 794: 148645
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Mobile advertising: A systematic literature review and future research agenda
Charles Jebarajakirthy,Haroon Iqbal Maseeh,Zakir Morshed,Amit Shankar,Denni Arli,Robin Pentecost
International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Meta-Computational Techniquesæ for Managing Spare Data: An Application in Off-Pump Heart Surgery
Han Lai,Yousaf Ali Khan,Syed Zaheer Abbas,Wathek Chammam
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2021; : 106267
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Traditional East Asian herbal medicines for the treatment of poststroke constipation
Chul Jin,Bo-Hyoung Jang,Jin Pyeong Jeon,Ye-Seul Lee,Seung-Bo Yang,Seungwon Kwon
Medicine. 2021; 100(15): e25503
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Laboratory hematologic features of COVID-19 associated liver injury: A systematic review
John L Frater,Tianjiao Wang,Yi-Shan Lee
World Journal of Meta-Analysis. 2021; 9(2): 192
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Laboratory hematologic features of COVID-19 associated liver injury: A systematic review
John L Frater,Tianjiao Wang,Yi-Shan Lee
World Journal of Meta-Analysis. 2021; 9(2): 193
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Economic Evaluation of New Oral Anticoagulants in Prevention of Venous Thrombosis Following Joint Replacement Surgery: A Systematic Review
Aziz Rezapour,Aghdas Souresrafil,Jalal Arabloo
Clinical Therapeutics. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Multimedia technology implementation to promote digital learning
Y Yulda,I Widiaty
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2021; 1098(2): 022117
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 What Is the State-of-the-Art in Clinical Trials on Vaccine Hesitancy 2015–2020?
Carla Pires
Vaccines. 2021; 9(4): 348
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Interventions to Improve Health and Well-Being Among Family Caregivers of Older Adults With Chronic Illnesses: A Scoping Review
Rungnapha Khiewchaum,Jo-Ana D. Chase
Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2021; 47(5): 45
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Dimensions of governance in interorganizational project networks
Jaakko Kujala,Kirsi Aaltonen,Nadezhda Gotcheva,Pertti Lahdenperä
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 2021; 14(3): 625
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatments and interventions for smoking cessation
Morgan Garrett,Tremayne Koochin,Ryan Ottwell,Wade Arthur,Taylor Rogers,Micah Hartwell,Elizabeth Chen,Alicia Ford,Drew Wright,Meghan Sealey,Lan Zhu,Matt Vassar
Tobacco Prevention & Cessation. 2021; 7(May): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Technology-based methods for the assessment of fine and gross motor skill in children: A systematic overview of available solutions and future steps for effective in-field use
Cain C. T Clark,Maria Cristina Bisi,Michael J. Duncan,Rita Stagni
Journal of Sports Sciences. 2021; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Assessing the uncertainty of treatment outcomes in a previous systematic review of venous leg ulcer randomized controlled trials: Additional secondary analysis
Kristen A. Eckert,Marissa J. Carter
Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Current systematic reviews and meta-analyses of COVID-19
Mahmoud Nassar,Nso Nso,Mostafa Alfishawy,Anastasia Novikov,Salim Yaghi,Luis Medina,Bahtiyar Toz,Sofia Lakhdar,Zarwa Idrees,Yungmin Kim,Dawa Ongyal Gurung,Raheel S Siddiqui,David Zheng,Mariam Agladze,Vikram Sumbly,Jasmine Sandhu,Francisco Cuevas Castillo,Nadya Chowdhury,Ravali Kondaveeti,Sakil Bhuiyan,Laura Guzman Perez,Riki Ranat,Carlos Gonzalez,Harangad Bhangoo,John Williams,Alaa Eldin Osman,Joyce Kong,Jonathan Ariyaratnam,Mahmoud Mohamed,Ismail Omran,Mariely Lopez,Akwe Nyabera,Ian Landry,Saba Iqbal,Anoosh Zafar Gondal,Sameen Hassan,Ahmed Daoud,Bahaaeldin Baraka,Theo Trandafirescu,Vincent Rizzo
World Journal of Virology. 2021; 10(4): 182
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Effect of virtual water trade on freshwater pollution in trading partners: a systematic literature review
Pari Teymouri,Reza Dehghanzadeh
Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 A systematic review of community psychosocial group interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities and mental health conditions
Jane Bourne,Toni Leigh Harrison,Sarah Wigham,Cindy-Jo Morison,Simon Hackett
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Anisakis allergy: unjustified social alarm versus healthy diet; commentary to the “Letter to the Editor” of Drs Daschner, Levsen, Cipriani, and del Hoyo, referencing to “World-wide prevalence of Anisakis larvae in fish and its relationship to human allergic anisakiasis: a systematic review”
Amene Raouf Rahmati,Elham Moghaddas,Behzad Kiani,Asma Afshari,Michelle Williams,Shokoofeh Shamsi
Parasitology Research. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into “Evidence4Equity” summaries
Elizabeth Houlding-Braunberger,Jennifer Petkovic,Nicholas Lebel,Peter Tugwell
International Journal for Equity in Health. 2021; 20(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, and Mercury on Human Health in Relation to the Consumption of Farmed Sea Bass in Italy: A Meta-Analytical Approach
Calogero Di Bella,Antonino Calagna,Gaetano Cammilleri,Pietro Schembri,Daniela Lo Monaco,Valentina Ciprì,Luisa Battaglia,Giuseppe Barbera,Vincenzo Ferrantelli,Saloua Sadok,Ines Tliba,Gianluigi Maria Lo Dico,Rosalinda Allegro
Frontiers in Marine Science. 2021; 8
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
22 Meta-MUMS COVID-19 web server: an online daily monitoring server for comparative and cumulative epidemiological analysis
Massoud Sokouti,Ramin Sadeghi,Saeid Pashazadeh,Saeid Eslami,Mohsen Sokouti,Morteza Ghojazadeh,Babak Sokouti
Journal of Public Health. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 Stretching for Recovery from Groin Pain or Injury in Athletes: A Critical and Systematic Review
José Afonso,João Gustavo Claudino,Hélder Fonseca,Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves,Victor Ferreira,José Marques Almeida,Filipe Manuel Clemente,Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2021; 6(3): 73
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 The effect of Gymnema sylvestre supplementation on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Suneel Devangan,Bincy Varghese,Ebin Johny,Surender Gurram,Ramu Adela
Phytotherapy Research. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 Linking model design and application for transdisciplinary approaches in social-ecological systems
Cara Steger,Shana Hirsch,Chris Cosgrove,Sarah Inman,Eric Nost,Xoco Shinbrot,Jessica P.R. Thorn,Daniel G. Brown,Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,Birgit Müller,Robin S. Reid,Catherine Tucker,Bettina Weibel,Julia A. Klein
Global Environmental Change. 2021; 66: 102201
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
26 Effectiveness of polyherbal formulations for the treatment of type 2 Diabetes mellitus - A systematic review and meta-analysis
Renuka Suvarna,Revathi P. Shenoy,Basavaraj S. Hadapad,Anupama V. Nayak
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
27 Systematic reviews in spinal cord injury: A step-by-step guide for rehabilitation science learners and clinicians
Mohammadreza Amiri,S. Mohammad Alavinia,Maryam Omidvar,Maureen Pakosh,B. Catharine Craven
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2021; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
28 Association Between Sense of Coherence and Periodontal Outcomes
Edison Andres Cruz Olivo,Larissa Corradi-Dias,Saul Martins Paiva,Rafael Jordão Storino,Marcela Faria Moura,Alexandre Godinho Pereira,Luís Otávio Miranda Cota,Fernando Oliveira Costa,Lucas Guimarães Abreu
Family & Community Health. 2021; 44(3): 225
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
29 Becoming an Academic Pediatric Surgeon Scientist in Canada
Mashriq Alganabi,Agostino Pierro
Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. 2021; : 151015
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
30 Calculating statistical power for meta-analysis using metapower
Jason W. Griffin
The Quantitative Methods for Psychology. 2021; 17(1): 24
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
31 Theory of planned behavior to promote physical activity of adults with physical disabilities: Meta-analytic structural equation modeling
Myung Ha Sur,Jaehun Jung,Deborah R. Shapiro
Disability and Health Journal. 2021; : 101199
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
32 Non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews
Aidan G Cashin,Rodrigo RN Rizzo,Benedict M Wand,Neil E OæConnell,Hopin Lee,Matthew K Bagg,Edel OæHagan,Christopher G Maher,Andrea D Furlan,Maurits W van Tulder,James H McAuley
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021; 2021(8)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
33 Asking “Meaning Questions” in Evidence-Based Reviews and the Utility of Qualitative Findings in Practice
Brigitte S. Cypress
Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing. 2021; 40(5): 288
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
34 Quality assessment for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies
Bashar J. Qumseya
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2021; 93(2): 486
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
35 Effect of high-intensity interval training on metabolic parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Isis Kelly dos Santos,Fernando Antônio Santana de Souza Nunes,Victor Sabino Queiros,Ricardo Ney Cobucci,Pedro Bruch Dantas,Gustavo Mafaldo Soares,Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco Cabral,Tecia Maria de Oliveira Maranhão,Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas,Wan-Xi Yang
PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(1): e0245023
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
36 Spin infrequently occurs in abstracts of systematic reviews for the pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Ryan Ottwell,Lindy Esmond,William Rea,Micah Hartwell,Mousumi Som,Rachael Harris,Zhuqi Miao,Lan Zhu,Wade Arthur,Travis Brachtenbach,Drew N. Wright,Matt Vassar
Diabetic Medicine. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
37 Factors associated with psychological distress for couples facing head and neck cancer: A systematic literature review
Linda McCabe-White,Nima Moghaddam,Anna Tickle,Sanchia Biswas
Psycho-Oncology. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
38 What is the relationship between fear of self, self-ambivalence, and obsessive–compulsive symptomatology? A systematic literature review
Tanya L. Godwin,Hayward J. Godwin,Laura M. Simonds
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
39 A Step Toward Standardizing Clinical Trials of Actinic Keratosis
Aditya K. Gupta,George Martin,Helen J Renaud
JAMA Dermatology. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
40 Knowledge, Attitude and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice among Physiotherapists Working in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey
Fatmah Hasani,Joy C. MacDermid,Ada Tang,Michelle Kho,Ahmad H. Alghadir,Shahnawaz Anwer
Healthcare. 2020; 8(3): 354
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
41 A structured classification of the types of pain research studies accessed by different health professionals involved in pain management
Vanitha Arumugam,Joy C MacDermid,Ruby Grewal,Zakir Uddin
British Journal of Pain. 2020; 14(4): 227
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
42 The effect of psyllium supplementation on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Cain C. T. Clark,Mina Salek,Elahe Aghabagheri,Sadegh Jafarnejad
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2020; 35(6): 1385
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
43 A network meta-analysis
Huiyan Luo,Wenjiang Zheng,Qian Yan,Boqing Wang,Baoqian Ye,Shicong Deng,Fan He,Xinqian Yang,Xiongwen Wang
Medicine. 2020; 99(31): e20500
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
44 Sex determination by radiographic localization of the inferior alveolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography in an Egyptian population
Arwa Mousa,Sahar El Dessouky,Dina El Beshlawy
Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2020; 50(2): 117
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
45 Systematic Review and Synthesis of Mechanism-based Classification Systems for Pain Experienced in the Musculoskeletal System
Muath A. Shraim,Hugo Massé-Alarie,Leanne M. Hall,Paul W. Hodges
The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2020; 36(10): 793
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
46 Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Iranian Speech and Language Pathologists Toward Evidence-Based Practice
Banafshe Mansuri,Seyed Abolfazl Tohidast,Masume Zareei
Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies. 2020; In Press(In Press)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
47 Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda
Anushree Tandon,Amandeep Dhir,A.K.M. Najmul Islam,Matti Mäntymäki
Computers in Industry. 2020; 122: 103290
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
48 Recent Studies on Modified Cellulose/Nanocellulose Epoxy Composites: A Systematic Review
Roberta Motta Neves,Heitor Luiz Ornaghi,Ademir José Zattera,Sandro Campos Amico
Carbohydrate Polymers. 2020; : 117366
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
49 Practice-Based Evidence and the Need for More Diverse Methods and Sources in Epidemiology, Public Health and Health Promotion
Lawrence W. Green,John P. Allegrante
American Journal of Health Promotion. 2020; 34(8): 946
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
50 In-office bleaching with low/medium vs. high concentrate hydrogen peroxide: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bianca Medeiros Maran,Thalita de Paris Matos,Andrea dos Santos de Castro,Laína Vochikovski,Ana Luiza Amadori,Alessandro D. Loguercio,Alessandra Reis,Sandrine Bittencourt Berger
Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 103: 103499
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
51 Knowing Well, Being Well: well-being born of understanding: How Humans Know
David L. Katz,Lawrence W. Green,John P. Allegrante,Miguel A. Martínez-González,Antonia Trichopoulou,Christopher D. Gardner,Anthony Crimarco,Matthew J. Landry,Priya Fielding-Singh
American Journal of Health Promotion. 2020; 34(8): 945
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
52 Few guidelines offer recommendations on how to assess and manage anxiety and distress in children with cancer: a content analysis
Tanya Lazor,Claire De Souza,Robin Urquhart,Eva Serhal,Anna R. Gagliardi
Supportive Care in Cancer. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
53 Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: Cross-Sectional Analysis
Ryan Ottwell,Taylor C Rogers,J Michael Anderson,Austin Johnson,Matt Vassar
JMIR Dermatology. 2020; 3(1): e16978
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
54 Research that matters: systematic reviews and meta-analyses
V. Nagendrababu,H. F. Duncan,P. M. H. Dummer
International Endodontic Journal. 2020; 53(4): 437
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
55 Diagnostic methods for the canine idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: A narrative evidence-based rapid review
Jeff M. Pérez,Chiara Alessi,Magdalena Grzech-Wojciechowska
Research in Veterinary Science. 2020; 128: 205
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
56 Cocoa Consumption and Blood Pressure in Middle-Aged and Elderly Subjects: a Meta-Analysis
Sadegh Jafarnejad,Mina Salek,Cain C. T. Clark
Current Hypertension Reports. 2020; 22(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
57 Increasing number of authors in Cochrane reviews
Sengül Gülen,Siv Fonnes,Kristoffer Andresen,Jacob Rosenberg
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
58 Sustainable Industry 4.0 in Production and Operations Management: A Systematic Literature Review
Andreas Felsberger,Gerald Reiner
Sustainability. 2020; 12(19): 7982
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
59 Tuberculosis and Other Airborne Microbes in Occupational Health and Safety
Esther Vaquero-Álvarez,Antonio Cubero-Atienza,Pilar Ruiz-Martínez,Manuel Vaquero-Abellán,María Dolores Redel-Macías,Pilar Aparicio-Martínez
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(19): 7088
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
60 A systematic review of economic evaluations of public health interventions targeting alcohol, tobacco, illicit drug use and problematic gambling: Using a case study to assess transferability
Camilla Nystrand,Mihretab Gebreslassie,Richard Ssegonja,Inna Feldman,Filipa Sampaio
Health Policy. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
61 Bibliometric Study of Technology and Occupational Health in Healthcare Sector: A Worldwide Trend to the Future
Esther Vaquero-Álvarez,Antonio Cubero-Atienza,Pilar Ruiz-Martínez,Manuel Vaquero-Abellán,María Dolores Redel Mecías,Pilar Aparicio-Martínez
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(18): 6732
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
62 Scientific and Clinical Abstracts From WOCNext 2020 Reimagined
Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing. 2020; 47(3S): S1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
63 Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews using the AMSTAR tool
Ana Beatriz Pizarro,Sebastián Carvajal,Adriana Buitrago-López
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
64 Operationalisation of a biopsychosocial approach for the non-pharmacological management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
Paapa Kwesi Ampiah,Paul Hendrick,Fiona Moffatt,Josephine Ahenkorah
Musculoskeletal Care. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
65 Identifying supply chain vulnerabilities in industrialized construction: an overview
E. M. A. C. Ekanayake,Geoffrey Q. P. Shen,Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,Emmanuel K. Owusu
International Journal of Construction Management. 2020; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
66 Internet of Things (IoT): Web learning for smart school system
A A Rukmana,B Mulyanti
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 830: 032042
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
67 The association between mental health nurse to registered nurse ratio and patient outcomes in psychiatric inpatient wards: Protocol for a systematic review
Nompilo Moyo,Martin Jones,Sue Gilbert,Lorena Romero,Richard Gray
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
68 Interrogating systematic review recommendations for effective chemical restraint
Eimear Muir-Cochrane,Candice Oster,Karen Grimmer
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
69 The effect of exercise as an intervention for women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Isis Kelly dos Santos,Maureen C. Ashe,Ricardo Ney Cobucci,Gustavo Mafaldo Soares,Tecia Maria de Oliveira Maranhão,Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas
Medicine. 2020; 99(16): e19644
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
70 A Systematic Review of the Physiological Effects of the Effortful Swallow Maneuver in Adults With Normal and Disordered Swallowing
Mariana M. Bahia,Soren Y. Lowell
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2020; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
71 Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation
Hannah Harrison,Simon J. Griffin,Isla Kuhn,Juliet A. Usher-Smith
BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2020; 20(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
72 An Assessment of Predatory Publication Use in Reviews
Charles D. Collom,Marilyn H. Oermann,Valerie K. Sabol,Phyllis A. Heintz
Clinical Nurse Specialist. 2020; 34(4): 152
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
73 Effect of Body Mass Index on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Propensity Analysis
Jong Ho Kim,Mingi Hong,Young Joon Kim,Ho Seok Lee,Young Suk Kwon,Jae Jun Lee
Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(6): 1612
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
74 Effectiveness of Family-Based Behavior Change Interventions on Obesity-Related Behavior Change in Children: A Realist Synthesis
Gemma Enright,Margaret Allman-Farinelli,Julie Redfern
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(11): 4099
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
75 Why do you need a biostatistician?
Antonia Zapf,Geraldine Rauch,Meinhard Kieser
BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2020; 20(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
76 Antiviral Agents for the Prevention and Treatment of Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Infection in Clinical Oncology: A Network Meta-Analysis
Farah Wasim Aribi Al-Zoobaee,Loo Yee Shen,Sajesh K. Veettil,Divya Gopinath,Mari Kannan Maharajan,Rohit Menon
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(23): 8891
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
77 A summary of the body of knowledge on physical activity for people following stroke. A protocol for a scoping review
Claire McFeeters,Katy Pedlow,Niamh Kennedy,Heather Colquhoun,Suzanne McDonough
Physical Therapy Reviews. 2020; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
78 The decision-making process in recommending electronic communication aids for children and young people who are non-speaking: the I-ASC mixed-methods study
Janice Murray,Yvonne Lynch,Juliet Goldbart,Liz Moulam,Simon Judge,Edward Webb,Mark Jayes,Stuart Meredith,Helen Whittle,Nicola Randall,David Meads,Stephane Hess
Health Services and Delivery Research. 2020; 8(45): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
79 Stakeholders’ experiences with the evidence aid website to support ‘real-time’ use of research evidence to inform decision-making in crisis zones: a user testing study
Ahmad Firas Khalid,John N. Lavis,Fadi El-Jardali,Meredith Vanstone
Health Research Policy and Systems. 2019; 17(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
80 The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials
Matthew Michelson,Katja Reuter
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 2019; : 100443
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
81 Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is properly perceived but its application is still limited in the orthopedic clinical practice: an online survey among the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) members
G. Lugano,S. Gianola,G. Castellini,G. Banfi,R. Seil,M. Denti,Laura de Girolamo
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
82 The effect of mother-infant skin to skin contact on success and duration of first breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Fatemeh Zahra Karimi,Ramin Sadeghi,Nahid Maleki-Saghooni,Talat Khadivzadeh
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; 58(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
83 Opioid Use and Intimate Partner Violence: a Systematic Review
Rebecca Stone,Emily F. Rothman
Current Epidemiology Reports. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
84 A Descriptive Analysis of Clinical Articles Published in the Last 50 Years in the Dental Literature
Zuhair S Natto,Ahmad Aljehani,Anfal Sarhan,Elaf Nawawi,Hanan Abdullatef,Lina Samarkandi,Maryam Nasser,Rawan Badri,Rufaida Quqandi,Sara Waheeb,Sarah Aljahdali,Yasser Merdad
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2019; 20(7): 867
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
85 Curriculum design and attrition among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review
Zenobia C.Y. Chan,Wing Yan Cheng,Man Kwan Fong,Yuk Sum Fung,Yin Ming Ki,Yee Ling Li,Hoi Tung Wong,Tsz Ling Wong,Wan Fei Tsoi
Nurse Education Today. 2019; 74: 41
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
86 Systematic Review of Self-Report Measures of General Mental Health and Wellbeing in Adolescent Mental Health
Natalie Bentley,Samantha Hartley,Sandra Bucci
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
87 Acute versus delayed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Michael T. Torchia,Daniel C. Austin,Niki Cozzolino,Lauren Jacobowitz,John-Erik Bell
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
88 How is communication of vaccines in traditional media: a systematic review
Daniel Catalan-Matamoros,Carmen Peñafiel-Saiz
Perspectives in Public Health. 2019; 139(1): 34
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
89 Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of the Relationship between Periodontal and Systemic Diseases
Zuhair S. Natto,Alhassan Hameedaldain
Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
90 Oropharyngeal dysphagia and laryngeal dysfunction after lung and heart transplantation: A systematic review
Rebecca Black,Patricia McCabe,Allan Glanville,Hans Bogaardt,Peter MacDonald,Catherine Madill
Disability and Rehabilitation. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
91 Biomedical and public health reviews and meta-analyses in Ethiopia had poor methodological quality: overview of evidence from 1970 to 2018
Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold,Sisay Mulugeta Alemu,Shimels Hussien Mohammed,Aklilu Endalamaw,Mohammed Akibu Mohammed,Andreas A. Teferra,Abera Kenay Tura,Nigus Gebremedhin Asefa,Balewgizie Sileshi Tegegne
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2019; 109: 90
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
92 Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide
Nicholas Mikolajewicz,Svetlana V. Komarova
Frontiers in Physiology. 2019; 10
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
93 An exploration of usability issues in telecare monitoring systems and possible solutions: a systematic literature review
Nazish Saeed,Mirfa Manzoor,Pouria Khosravi
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
94 Elevated blood pressure reduction after a-lipoic acid supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Virginia Boccardi,Mohsen Taghizadeh,Sina Amirjani,Sadegh Jafarnejad
Journal of Human Hypertension. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
95 Efficacy of ?-3 supplementation in patients with psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Cain C. T. Clark,Mohsen Taghizadeh,Mina Nahavandi,Sadegh Jafarnejad
Clinical Rheumatology. 2019; 38(4): 977
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
96 5-0 Polypropylene versus 5-0 fast absorbing plain gut for cutaneous wound closure: a randomized evaluator blind trial
Daniel Brian Eisen,Anne Rang Zhuang,Aliza Hasan,Victoria Rose Sharon,Heejung Bang,Milene Kennedy Crispin
Archives of Dermatological Research. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
97 ShenQi FuZheng injection as an adjunctive treatment to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis
Hongbo Zhang,Tingting Chen,Lizhu Shan
Pharmaceutical Biology. 2019; 57(1): 612
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
98 Practical recommendations to conduct a neuroimaging meta-analysis for neuropsychiatric disorders
Masoud Tahmasian,Amir A. Sepehry,Fateme Samea,Tina Khodadadifar,Zahra Soltaninejad,Nooshin Javaheripour,Habibolah Khazaie,Mojtaba Zarei,Simon B. Eickhoff,Claudia R. Eickhoff
Human Brain Mapping. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
99 Liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
Yohei Hirano,Yukari Miyoshi,Yutaka Kondo,Ken Okamoto,Hiroshi Tanaka
Critical Care. 2019; 23(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
100 Decreased Reoperations and Improved Outcomes With Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison to Hemiarthroplasty for Geriatric Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Daniel C. Austin,Michael T. Torchia,Niki H. Cozzolino,Lauren E. Jacobowitz,John-Erik Bell
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2019; 33(1): 49
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
101 The expression of the true self in the online world: a literature review
Chuan Hu,Sameer Kumar,Jiao Huang,Kurunathan Ratnavelu
Behaviour & Information Technology. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
102 Pre-operative femoral nerve block for hip fracture—A systematic review with meta-analysis
C. Skjold,A. M. Møller,K. Wildgaard
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
103 Quality of life after amputation in patients with advanced complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review
Brijesh Ayyaswamy,Bilal Saeed,Anoop Anand,Lai Chan,Vishwanath Shetty
EFORT Open Reviews. 2019; 4(9): 533
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
104 Information-sharing in health and social care: Lessons from a socio-technical initiative
Tejal Shah,Louise Wilson,Nick Booth,Olly Butters,Joe McDonald,Kathryn Common,Mike Martin,Joel Minion,Paul Burton,Madeleine Murtagh
Public Money & Management. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
105 Environmental Chemicals and Autism: A Scoping Review of the Human and Animal Research
Katherine E. Pelch,Ashley L. Bolden,Carol F. Kwiatkowski
Environmental Health Perspectives. 2019; 127(4): 046001
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
106 Comparative effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation via buccal spray versus oral supplements on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in humans
Lucy Pritchard,Stephen Lewis,Mary Hickson
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 2019; 17(4): 487
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
107 Systematic reviews should not be assumed to be systematic and comprehensive
Eloise Baxendale,Annabelle Hook
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
108 A systematic review and meta-analysis on performance of intelligent systems in lung cancer: Where are we?
Massoud Sokouti,Mohsen Sokouti,Babak Sokouti
Artificial Intelligence Review. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
109 Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Eluting Stents: Is There a Mortality Risk in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease?
Joshua A. Beckman,Christopher J. White
Circulation. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
110 A Systematic Review of Leadership Definitions, Competencies, and Assessment Methods in Pharmacy Education
Brent N. Reed,Abigail M. Klutts,T. Joseph Mattingly
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2019; 83(9): 7520
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
111 Development and validation of a quality appraisal tool for validity studies (QAVALS)
Shweta Gore,Allon Goldberg,Min H. Huang,Michael Shoemaker,Jennifer Blackwood
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
112 Are carbohydrate drinks more effective than preoperative fasting: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Lyrics Noba,Ann Wakefield
Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
113 A systematic review and meta-analyses of risk factors associated with lameness in dairy cows
Andreas W. Oehm,Gabriela Knubben-Schweizer,Anna Rieger,Alexander Stoll,Sonja Hartnack
BMC Veterinary Research. 2019; 15(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
114 Eating disorders symptoms in sexual minority women: A systematic review
Paolo Meneguzzo,Enrico Collantoni,Davide Gallicchio,Paolo Busetto,Marco Solmi,Paolo Santonastaso,Angela Favaro
European Eating Disorders Review. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
115 Diseases Diagnosis Using Fuzzy Logic Methods: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Review
Hossein Ahmadi,Marsa Gholamzadeh,Leila Shahmoradi,Mehrbakhsh Nilashi,Pooria Rashvand
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
116 A meta-analysis of cumin ( Cuminum cyminim L.) consumption on metabolic and anthropometric indices in overweight and type 2 diabetics
Sadegh Jafarnejad,Catherine Tsang,Mohsen Taghizadeh,Zatollah Asemi,Seyed Ali Keshavarz
Journal of Functional Foods. 2018; 44: 313
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
117 Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics
Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu,Shaju Jacob Pulikkotil,Omer Sheriff Sultan,Jayakumar Jayaraman,Ove A. Peters
Journal of Endodontics. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
118 Systematic reviews versus narrative reviews in clinical anatomy: Methodological approaches in the era of evidence-based anatomy
Brandon Michael Henry,Bendik Skinningsrud,Jens Vikse,Przemyslaw A. Pekala,Jerzy A. Walocha,Marious Loukas,R. Shane Tubbs,Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski
Clinical Anatomy. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
119 Using Computational support in motor ability analysis of individuals with Down syndrome: literature review
Clauirton A. Siebra,Helio. A. Siebra
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
120 Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering
Vahid Garousi,Michael Felderer,Mika V. Mäntylä
Information and Software Technology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
121 Effectiveness of targeting fathers for breastfeeding promotion: systematic review and meta-analysis
Pasyodun Koralage Buddhika Mahesh,Moraendage Wasantha Gunathunga,Suriyakumara Mahendra Arnold,Chintha Jayasinghe,Sisira Pathirana,Mohamed Fahmy Makarim,Pradeep Malaka Manawadu,Sameera Jayan Senanayake
BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
122 Does auriculotherapy have therapeutic effectiveness? An overview of systematic reviews
Andreia Vieira,Ana Mafalda Reis,Luís Carlos Matos,Jorge Machado,António Moreira
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 2018; 33: 61
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
123 The burden of non-infectious intraocular inflammatory eye diseases: a systematic literature review
J. Bradford Rice,Alan G. White,Lauren M. Scarpati,George J. Wan,Winnie W. Nelson
Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2018; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
124 Effect of l-citrulline supplementation on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Sepideh Mahboobi,Catherine Tsang,Shahla Rezaei,Sadegh Jafarnejad
Journal of Human Hypertension. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
125 New insights into physiopathology of immunodeficiency-associated vaccine-derived poliovirus infection; systematic review of over 5 decades of data
Mohammadreza Shaghaghi,Saeed Soleyman-jahi,Hassan Abolhassani,Reza Yazdani,Gholamreza Azizi,Nima Rezaei,Mohamed-Ridha Barbouche,Mark A. McKinlay,Asghar Aghamohammadi
Vaccine. 2018; 36(13): 1711
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
126 Multicenter comprehensive methodological and technical analysis of 832 pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) interventions performed in 349 patients for peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment: An international survey study
Maciej Nowacki,Mohammad Alyami,Laurent Villeneuve,Frederic Mercier,Martin Hubner,Wouter Willaert,Wim Ceelen,Marc Reymond,Denis Pezet,Catherine Arvieux,Vladimir Khomyakov,Laura Lay,Sergio Gianni,Wojciech Zegarski,Naoual Bakrin,Olivier Glehen
European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
127 Measuring the success of canine and feline preventative healthcare consultations: A systematic review
N.J. Robinson,Z. Belshaw,M.L. Brennan,R.S. Dean
Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2018; 158: 18
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
128 Effect of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) supplementation on positive and negative syndrome scale in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Amir Ghaderi,Anna Bussu,Catherine Tsang,Sadegh Jafarnejad
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
129 Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review
Sally Lindsay,Kendall Kolne,Elaine Cagliostro
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting. 2018; 1(2): e11679
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
130 Antifungal therapeutic failures in India: an important issue being overlooked
Sidharth Sonthalia,Mahima Agrawal,Mohamad Goldust,Shukla Das,Sambit N Bhattacharya
The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018; 18(11): 1181
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
131 Twelve tips for undertaking a focused systematic review in medical education
Morris Gordon,Ciaran Grafton-Clarke,Elaine Hill,Dawne Gurbutt,Madalena Patricio,Michelle Daniel
Medical Teacher. 2018; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
132 Definition, prevalence and predictive factors of benign multiple sclerosis
Tatjana Reynders,Miguel Dæhaeseleer,Jacques De Keyser,Guy Nagels,Marie B. Dæhooghe
eNeurologicalSci. 2017; 7: 37
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
133 The Use of Traditional Media for Public Communication about Medicines: A Systematic Review of Characteristics and Outcomes
Daniel Catalan-Matamoros,Carmen Peñafiel-Saiz
Health Communication. 2017; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
134 An integrative literature review exploring the clinical management of delirium in patients with advanced cancer
Hayley Lawley,Alistair Hewison
Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
135 Acceptance of a systematic review as a thesis: survey of biomedical doctoral programs in Europe
Livia Puljak,Damir Sapunar
Systematic Reviews. 2017; 6(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
136 Losing a foot versus losing a dollar; a systematic review of cost studies in diabetic foot complications
Ioannis Petrakis,Ilias J Kyriopoulos,Alexandros Ginis,Kostas Athanasakis
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 2017; 17(2): 165
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
137 Grip Strength in Women Being Treated for Breast Cancer and Receiving Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: Systematic Review
E. M. Van der Weijden-Van Doornik,Dagmar E. Slot,Chris Burtin,G. A. van der Weijden
Physical Therapy. 2017; 97(9): 904
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
138 Effects of probiotics on experimental necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gayatri Athalye-Jape,Shripada Rao,Sanjay Patole
Pediatric Research. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
139 Long-Term Systemic Corticosteroid Exposure: A Systematic Literature Review
J. Bradford Rice,Alan G. White,Lauren M. Scarpati,George Wan,Winnie W. Nelson
Clinical Therapeutics. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
140 Impact of healthcare insurance on medical expense in China: new evidence from meta-analysis
Jian Chai,Limin Xing,Youhong Zhou,Shuo Li,K. K. Lai,Shouyang Wang
Soft Computing. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
141 Management of first depression or generalized anxiety disorder episode in adults in primary care: A systematic metareview
Damien Driot,Michel Bismuth,Adrien Maurel,Julie Soulie-Albouy,Jordan Birebent,Stéphane Oustric,Julie Dupouy
La Presse Médicale. 2017; 46(12): 1124
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
142 Ethical experiential learning in medical, nursing and allied health education: A narrative review
Sandra Grace,Ev Innes,Narelle Patton,Lynette Stockhausen
Nurse Education Today. 2017; 51: 23
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
143 Reconstruction of gluteal deformities: a systematic review and experience of four cases
Mathias Tremp,Pietro Giovanni di Summa,Carlo M. Oranges,Dirk J. Schaefer,Daniel Felix Kalbermatten
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 2016; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
144 Where literature is scarce: observations and lessons learnt from four systematic reviews of zoonoses in African countries
Silvia Alonso,Johanna Lindahl,Kristina Roesel,Sylvain Gnamien Traore,Bassa Antoine Yobouet,Andrée Prisca Ndjoug Ndour,Maud Carron,Delia Grace
Animal Health Research Reviews. 2016; 17(01): 28
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
145 The Effect of ShenQi FuZheng Injection in Combination with Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone on the Improvement of Efficacy and Immune Function in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Cao dedong,Xu huilin,He Anbing,Xu Ximing,Ge wei,Jan P. A. Baak
PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(3): e0152270
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
146 Tocilizumab as monotherapy or combination therapy for treating active rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety reported in randomized controlled trials
Xavier M. Teitsma,Anne Karien A. Marijnissen,Johannes W. J. Bijlsma,Floris P. J. Lafeber,Johannes W. G. Jacobs
Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2016; 18(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
147 Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites: An overview
Olavo B. de Oliveira-Neto,Fabiano Timbó Barbosa,Célio Fernando de Sousa-Rodrigues,Fernando José C. de Lima
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
148 Review and Meta-Analysis of Emerging Risk Factors for Agricultural Injury
Rohan Jadhav,Chandran Achutan,Gleb Haynatzki,Shireen Rajaram,Risto Rautiainen
Journal of Agromedicine. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
149 Risk Factors for Agricultural Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Rohan Jadhav,Chandran Achutan,Gleb Haynatzki,Shireen Rajaram,Risto Rautiainen
Journal of Agromedicine. 2015; 20(4): 434
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
150 Evidence-Based Medicine of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Systematic Review of Operative Management across 20 Years
Justin K. Scheer,Joshua Bakhsheshian,Shayan Fakurnejad,Taemin Oh,Nader S. Dahdaleh,Zachary A. Smith
Global Spine Journal. 2015; 5(1): 73
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Advantages of Sy...
Limitations in S...
Publication Bias
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded7037    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 150    

Recommend this journal